Tour by topic: Difference between revisions
m →Far term target of APM: added missing line-breaks |
→Pathways …: added two links |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
= Topics = | = Topics = | ||
== Pathways … == | == [[Pathways]] … == | ||
'''… towards advanced gem based productive nanosystems.''' | '''… towards advanced gem based productive nanosystems.''' | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
★ [[Incremental path]] => One big blocker: Lack of proper [[termination control]] <br> | ★ [[Incremental path]] => One big blocker: Lack of proper [[termination control]] <br> | ||
★ [[Direct path]] => [[Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief]] <br> | ★ [[Direct path]] => [[Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief]] <br> | ||
<small>There were/are some tensions between the sides. For one case see: [[Pathway controversy]]</small> | |||
== Far term target of [[APM]] == | == Far term target of [[APM]] == | ||
Revision as of 20:50, 31 May 2026
|
Topics
Pathways …
… towards advanced gem based productive nanosystems.
★ Incremental path => One big blocker: Lack of proper termination control
★ Direct path => Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief
There were/are some tensions between the sides. For one case see: Pathway controversy
Far term target of APM
… as identified in Nanosystems via applying the methodology of explorartory enginering.
★ Why gemstones?
– Oxidation and the fruit analogy, Atomically precise surface passivation
– Undesired cold-welding vs desired: Seamless covalent welding
★ Why (mechanical) metamaterials?
– Gem-gum Superelasticity (wiki-TODO: Add two new graphics on that.)
★ Why cogs-n-gears?
– They get the job done and are not a naive transfer of ideas on closer inspection.
🪤 Trapdoors
★ 🪤 "Diffusion transport is free."
– No, Diffusion transport is not free. One has to pay the energy at toll stations that may have no "small change" to give back.
… Heck cog-n-gear attachment chain trannsport may become even become more efficient than diffusion when advanced and operated sowly:
… See: Dissipation sharing & Exothermy offloading (in how far these tricks work is highly speculative)
★ 🪤 "Scaling laws make things worse."
– Yes, physics change when going down to the nanoscale, BUT …
– No, not necesarily for the worse for macroscale style cog-n-gear machinery
– The are two critical scaling laws that make things better rather than worse. Both as of 2026 still barely known.
… See below in section: Physical basics
★ 🪤 "Simulations show that these would not work."
– "No, nanodiamond does not behave like jelly."
– "No, one would not "see" the atomic wiggles when "seeing" the machine motions at proposed operation speeds."
… See: Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements
… See: Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery
★ 🪤 "Scaling laws make things worse"
★ … See: Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale
★ To overcompensating scaling aws that make things better:
– Higher throughput of smaller machinery
– Same relative deflections across scales
… See: How macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale outperforms its native scale
Scale transposed prototyping
★ Personal projects of this wikis author:
– RepRec, ReChain, MecCirc, ReMec projects
Physical basics
… and building some useful intuition (oversimplification aware).
★ Intuitive feel
★ Intuitively understanding the size of an atom & Magnification theme-park
★ Convenience of size steps of factor 32
★ Log polar mapping – as for – Distorted visualization methods for convergent assembly
… (Lagrangian mechanics for nanomechanical circuits)
★ Atomic orbitals
Far term applications
★ Products of gem-gum-tec
★ Cioncrete example:Gem-gum suit
★ Likely visual appearance of gem-gum products
★ The look of our environment
★ ♻️ Recycling and much faster product avaiability the Global microcomponent redistribution system
★ General concept of a new sphere: Mechanosphere – efforts averting a severe Gem-gum waste crisis
★ Solving biggest civilization problems: Carbon capture buoy scenario