Tour by topic: Difference between revisions
→Far term target of APM: cleaned up the trapdoors a bit |
→Topics: some more cleanup |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
★ '''Why cogs-n-gears?''' <br> | ★ '''Why cogs-n-gears?''' <br> | ||
– They get the job done and are not a naive transfer of ideas on closer inspection. <br> | |||
– 🪤 No, Diffusiin transPort is not free, one pays the energy at toll stations that may have no small change. <br> | |||
… Heck attachment chains may become even become more efficient than diffusion when advanced and operated sowly <br> | |||
… See: [[Dissipation sharing]] & [[Exothermy offloading]] (in how far these tricks work is highly speculative) <br> | |||
---- | ---- | ||
– | – 🪤 '''Trapdoor: "Scaling laws make things worse."''' <br> | ||
– Yes, physics change when going down to the nanoscale, BUT … | |||
– No, not necesarily for the worse for macroscale style cog-n-gear machinery | |||
– '''The are two critical scaling laws that make things better rather than worse.''' Both as of 2026 still barely known. <br> | |||
… See below in section: '''Physical basics''' <br> | |||
---- | ---- | ||
– 🪤 '''Trapdoors:''' <br> | – 🪤 '''Trapdoors: "Simulations sown these won't work."''' <br> | ||
– "[[A better intuition for diamondoid nanomachinery than jelly|No, nanodiamond | – "[[A better intuition for diamondoid nanomachinery than jelly|No, nanodiamond does not behave like jelly.]]" <br> | ||
– "[[Stroboscopic illusion in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements|No, one would not "see" the atomic wiggles when seeing the machine motions]]."<br> | – "[[Stroboscopic illusion in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements|No, one would not "see" the atomic wiggles when "seeing" the machine motions]] at proposed operation speeds."<br> | ||
… See: [[Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements]] <br> | … See: [[Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements]] <br> | ||
… See: [[Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery]] | … See: [[Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery]] | ||
---- | ---- | ||
★ [[Scale transposed prototyping]] <br> | ★ [[Scale transposed prototyping]] <br> | ||
| Line 43: | Line 49: | ||
'''… and building some useful intuition (oversimplification aware).''' | '''… and building some useful intuition (oversimplification aware).''' | ||
---- | |||
★ [[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]] | ★ 🪤 '''Trapdoors: "Scaling laws make things worse"''' <br> | ||
★ … See: [[Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale]] <br> | |||
★ To overcompensating scaling aws that make things better: <br> | |||
– [[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]] <br> | |||
– [[Same relative deflections across scales]] <br> | |||
… See: [[How macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale outperforms its native scale]] <br> | |||
---- | ---- | ||
★ [[Intuitive feel]] <br> | ★ [[Intuitive feel]] <br> | ||
| Line 70: | Line 81: | ||
* [[Story scenarios]] | * [[Story scenarios]] | ||
★ [[The look of our environment]] <br> | ★ [[The look of our environment]] <br> | ||
= Related = | = Related = | ||
Revision as of 19:33, 31 May 2026
|
Topics
Pathways …
… towards advanced gem based productive nanosystems.
★ Incremental path => One big blocker: Lack of proper termination control
★ Direct path => Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief
Far term target of APM
… as identified in Nanosystems via applying the methodology of explorartory enginering.
★ Why gemstones?
– Oxidation and the fruit analogy, Atomically precise surface passivation
– Undesired cold-welding vs desired: Seamless covalent welding
★ Why (mechanical) metamaterials?
– Gem-gum Superelasticity (wiki-TODO: Add two new graphics on that.)
★ Why cogs-n-gears?
– They get the job done and are not a naive transfer of ideas on closer inspection.
– 🪤 No, Diffusiin transPort is not free, one pays the energy at toll stations that may have no small change.
… Heck attachment chains may become even become more efficient than diffusion when advanced and operated sowly
… See: Dissipation sharing & Exothermy offloading (in how far these tricks work is highly speculative)
– 🪤 Trapdoor: "Scaling laws make things worse."
– Yes, physics change when going down to the nanoscale, BUT …
– No, not necesarily for the worse for macroscale style cog-n-gear machinery
– The are two critical scaling laws that make things better rather than worse. Both as of 2026 still barely known.
… See below in section: Physical basics
– 🪤 Trapdoors: "Simulations sown these won't work."
– "No, nanodiamond does not behave like jelly."
– "No, one would not "see" the atomic wiggles when "seeing" the machine motions at proposed operation speeds."
… See: Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements
… See: Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery
★ Scale transposed prototyping
– Personal projects of this wikis author: RepRec, ReChain, MecCirc, ReMec projects
Physical basics
… and building some useful intuition (oversimplification aware).
★ 🪤 Trapdoors: "Scaling laws make things worse"
★ … See: Macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale
★ To overcompensating scaling aws that make things better:
– Higher throughput of smaller machinery
– Same relative deflections across scales
… See: How macroscale style machinery at the nanoscale outperforms its native scale
★ Intuitive feel
★ Intuitively understanding the size of an atom & Magnification theme-park
★ Convenience of size steps of factor 32
★ Log polar mapping – as for – Distorted visualization methods for convergent assembly
… (Lagrangian mechanics for nanomechanical circuits)
Far term applications
★ Products of gem-gum-tec
★ Cioncrete example:Gem-gum suit
★ Likely visual appearance of gem-gum products
★ The look of our environment
★ ♻️ Recycling and much faster product avaiability the Global microcomponent redistribution system
★ General concept of a new sphere: Mechanosphere – efforts averting a severe Gem-gum waste crisis
★ Solving biggest civilization problems: Carbon capture buoy scenario