Pathways to advanced APM systems: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with "{{stub}} * The incremental path * The direct path"
 
Added the pathways graphic as it was sorely missing here.
 
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
{{stub}}
[[File:APM-EarlyDevelopmentPaths.jpg|600px|thumb|right|A possible map for [[incremental path]]ways and [[mixed path]]ways. <br>Left axis: [[technology levels]] <br>Right axis see: [[convergent assembly comparison]] and [[hierarchical self-assembly]]. <br>The [[direct path]] starts top left (3,0) right away facing the challenge of more difficult [[scaling of system complexity]] rather than getting the challenge to get to better i.e. stiffer materials.<br> The red stars indicate challenging blockades: <br>(1,0) [[Positional assembly redundancy blockade]] and <br>(0,5) [[Thermal driven selfassembly diffusion speed slowdown blockade]].]]
[[File:Rock_climber_on_the_Main_Wall_Trowbarrow.jpg|400px|thumb|right|the steep direct path]]
[[File:Stone_path_on_Fan_Brycheiniog.jpg|400px|thumb|right|the long incremental path]]
* The [[Incremental path]]
* The [[Direct path]]
* The [[Mixed path]]
* The historic [[Feynman path]]
* The paths that aren't paths: [[Brownian Path]] => [[Accidental Path]]
[[Category:General]]
[[Category:Disquisition]]
{{wikitodo|Needs a basic introduction.}}


* The [[incremental path]]
Its not a binary either or question whether the direct or the incremental path will be taken its more that the two represent extreme ends of a spectrum of possible development progressions.
* The [[direct path]]
Both types of paths will likely heavily borrow from the [[non mechanical technology path]].
 
There seems to be a peaceful internal conflict. <br>
See also: [[Pathway controversy]].
 
== Views of the paths from the proponents of different viewpoints ==
 
Critiques:
* incremental path (Ralph Merkle & co): slow and aimless little targeted effort ...<br> {{wikitodo|collect their arguments}}
* direct path (E.Drexler & co): too hard to access experimentally, slow experimental progress, little research motivation (funds)
 
== Relation to speed of introduction of advanced productive nanosystems ==
 
It seems any bets are off here.
It is worth to note that the usual association of the direct path with sudden and rapid changes and the indirect path with slow and progressive changes
might be not incorrect.
* {{wikitodo|treat benefits and risks of fast vs slow changes}}
 
== Related ==
 
* [[Bootstrapping methods for productive nanosystems]]
* [[Spectrum of pathways]]
* [[Pathway controversy]]
* [[Bridging the gaps]]
* '''Up: [[Where to start targeted development]]'''
----
{{wikitodo|These following pages need some review.}}
* [[Non mechanical technology path]]
* [[Brownian technology path]]
 
== External links ==
 
Citation from the article "[http://crnano.typepad.com/crnblog/2006/09/from_here_to_na.html From Here to Nanofactories]" (crnano blog – Posted on September 24, 2006): <br>
"..., advances in one dimension will synergize with advances in other dimensions, so it may be more efficient to go straight to a new technology that makes bigger leaps forward in several dimensions at once. But if such a technology can't be found for a particular leap, it can be done in a series of incremental steps. ..."
 
[[category:Incremental path]]
[[category:Direct path]]

Latest revision as of 21:26, 4 October 2026

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.
A possible map for incremental pathways and mixed pathways.
Left axis: technology levels
Right axis see: convergent assembly comparison and hierarchical self-assembly.
The direct path starts top left (3,0) right away facing the challenge of more difficult scaling of system complexity rather than getting the challenge to get to better i.e. stiffer materials.
The red stars indicate challenging blockades:
(1,0) Positional assembly redundancy blockade and
(0,5) Thermal driven selfassembly diffusion speed slowdown blockade.
the steep direct path
the long incremental path

(wiki-TODO: Needs a basic introduction.)

Its not a binary either or question whether the direct or the incremental path will be taken its more that the two represent extreme ends of a spectrum of possible development progressions. Both types of paths will likely heavily borrow from the non mechanical technology path.

There seems to be a peaceful internal conflict.
See also: Pathway controversy.

Views of the paths from the proponents of different viewpoints

Critiques:

  • incremental path (Ralph Merkle & co): slow and aimless little targeted effort ...
    (wiki-TODO: collect their arguments)
  • direct path (E.Drexler & co): too hard to access experimentally, slow experimental progress, little research motivation (funds)

Relation to speed of introduction of advanced productive nanosystems

It seems any bets are off here. It is worth to note that the usual association of the direct path with sudden and rapid changes and the indirect path with slow and progressive changes might be not incorrect.

  • (wiki-TODO: treat benefits and risks of fast vs slow changes)

Related


(wiki-TODO: These following pages need some review.)

External links

Citation from the article "From Here to Nanofactories" (crnano blog – Posted on September 24, 2006):
"..., advances in one dimension will synergize with advances in other dimensions, so it may be more efficient to go straight to a new technology that makes bigger leaps forward in several dimensions at once. But if such a technology can't be found for a particular leap, it can be done in a series of incremental steps. ..."