APM used for the preservation of nature: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
relativating early experiments failure that exist in some cases. | relativating early experiments failure that exist in some cases. | ||
* [[Indoor greenhouse faring for all crops]] | * [[Indoor greenhouse faring for all crops]] | ||
* [[Vertical farming for all crops]] | * [[Vertical farming for all crops]] … it did not work out so well with current technology, (also we'll want fusion power for that eventually) | ||
* [[Forestogriculture]] … fun wild idea but questionably practical | * [[Forestogriculture]] … fun wild idea but questionably practical even if it becomes technically possible. | ||
* [[General agriculture on the oceans]] … loads of horizontal space there so long still sticking to direct solar | * [[General agriculture on the oceans]] … loads of horizontal space there so long still sticking to direct solar | ||
== Reducing and minimizing waste spill plus maximizing cleanup down to a tolerable steady state == | == Reducing and minimizing waste spill plus maximizing cleanup down to a tolerable steady state == | ||
Latest revision as of 13:26, 20 June 2026
Reducing and undoing farming damage
- Nature reserve … giving back a lot of land area to nature after we scarred the large parts of the land of Earth with with farm land
All of these with much more advanced technology than what we have now (2026)
relativating early experiments failure that exist in some cases.
- Indoor greenhouse faring for all crops
- Vertical farming for all crops … it did not work out so well with current technology, (also we'll want fusion power for that eventually)
- Forestogriculture … fun wild idea but questionably practical even if it becomes technically possible.
- General agriculture on the oceans … loads of horizontal space there so long still sticking to direct solar
Reducing and minimizing waste spill plus maximizing cleanup down to a tolerable steady state
- Recycling & Mobility prevention guideline
Not spilling waste is a necessary virtue and skill to preserve nature as we learned from the desaster we had (and still have) with non biodegradable synthetic polymer plastics that crumbles into toxic micro-plastic and persistent organic pollutants (POPs) including toxic PFAS (aka forever chemicals) - The solution to pollution is dilution only works if things degrade faster in nature than they are spilled.
Much of gemstone based metamaterials will likely not be well degradable. Making a focus on waste spill all the more important.
See page: Gem-gum waste crisis
Protection of especially vulnerable habitats
Guarding for (or rather against) the worst possible catastrophes
For if the worst of the worst happens on Earth (god forbid).
A supervolcanoe eruption could be an extinction level threat form many species not at the blame of human actions.
Yes, this is not extectable any time soon but it can't be proven not to happen very soon.
Unlike asteroid impacts where looking, preparing, and probability estimation is more viable.
Botanical garden and zoo arch habitats
- Underground. See: Underground transport and habitation
- Habitats off earth maybe including even floating habitats on Venus
Even big plants like trees (arboretums).
- Disaster proof … quickly rebuilding after large catastrophes can help nature too when the scale is above a certain enormity
External links
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_(agriculture) … the scars of the biosphere