Difference between revisions of "Talk:Assembly levels"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "The current state of this page is pretty bad. <br> Here's a TODO list for this page: * The table on the right is way too big. * Assembly steps and size specific component typ...")
 
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
* Level naming scheme needs to be fixed.  
 
* Level naming scheme needs to be fixed.  
 
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 18:23, 19 May 2021 (CEST)
 
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 18:23, 19 May 2021 (CEST)
 +
----
 +
'''Major issue that needs fixing:''' <br>
 +
Assembled Parts need to be quite a bit smaller than the assembly chambers. <br>
 +
=> There'a an assembly level missing between crystolecules and microcomponents. <br>
 +
Good size scales may be (chambersize, partsize respectively):
 +
* 32nm, 2nm – [[crystolecule]]s small – some need [[seamless covalent welding]]
 +
* 1µm, 64nm – Diamondoin molecular machine elements out of [[crystolecule]]s – big – often with movable parts already
 +
* 32µm, 2µm – [[microcomponent]]s
 +
* 1mm, 64↓m – [[mesocomponent]]s
 +
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 10:56, 3 June 2021 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 10:56, 3 June 2021

The current state of this page is pretty bad.
Here's a TODO list for this page:

  • The table on the right is way too big.
  • Assembly steps and size specific component types should be vertically interspersed instead of side by side.
  • The assembly target component should be associated with the assembly level in question.
  • There should be clear separators between the major assembly levels.
  • Level naming scheme needs to be fixed.

Apm (talk) 18:23, 19 May 2021 (CEST)


Major issue that needs fixing:
Assembled Parts need to be quite a bit smaller than the assembly chambers.
=> There'a an assembly level missing between crystolecules and microcomponents.
Good size scales may be (chambersize, partsize respectively):

Apm (talk) 10:56, 3 June 2021 (CEST)