Difference between revisions of "Structural DNA nanotechnology"
From apm
(moved here from from tech.level 0 page) |
m (added references section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Mentioned here [http://www.foresight.org/Conferences/MNT05/Papers/Seeman/index.html] under the section "DNA as Construction Material" and referenced here <ref>Hagerman, P.J. (1988), Flexibility of DNA, Ann. Rev. Biophys. & Biophys. Chem. 17, 265-286.</ref> (unchecked). | Mentioned here [http://www.foresight.org/Conferences/MNT05/Papers/Seeman/index.html] under the section "DNA as Construction Material" and referenced here <ref>Hagerman, P.J. (1988), Flexibility of DNA, Ann. Rev. Biophys. & Biophys. Chem. 17, 265-286.</ref> (unchecked). | ||
Is there quantitative information about the stiffness of whole DNA bricks ('''to investigate''')? | Is there quantitative information about the stiffness of whole DNA bricks ('''to investigate''')? | ||
| + | |||
| + | == References == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <references /> | ||
Revision as of 14:48, 29 December 2013
DNA frameworks
DNA bricks
[...]
When one watches the simulation of the self assembly process of DNA bricks [TODO add link] one is led to doubt the stiffness of the product. The DNA double helix can create siff polymeres if the used doublehelix segments are kept in the length range from one to three turns. Mentioned here [1] under the section "DNA as Construction Material" and referenced here [1] (unchecked). Is there quantitative information about the stiffness of whole DNA bricks (to investigate)?
References
- ↑ Hagerman, P.J. (1988), Flexibility of DNA, Ann. Rev. Biophys. & Biophys. Chem. 17, 265-286.
