Negative pressure bearings

From apm
Revision as of 18:30, 10 September 2020 by Apm (Talk | contribs) (basic version of the page)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

In suberlubricating strained shell sleeve bearings when the gap between the axle and the sleeve is gradually increased in size by deliberate design changes, then it can get to the point where the axle and the sleeve go from mutually repelling each other (akin to a macroscale press fit) to mutually attracting each other. And that well before the situation becomes unstable and the axle snaps to one side of the sleeve.

Effectively there is a negative pressure between axle and sleeve:

  • pulling the surface of the axle outward in all directions to the sleeve and
  • pulling the surface of the sleeve inward to the axle

Maximizing of gap size leads to maximization of negative pressure and mimimization of potential waviness.
This leads to the following open questions:

  • Does the maximally stable gap size correspond to minimal power dissipation? This would be a natural design goal for ultra low dissipation bearings for low loads but high speeds.
  • Or is the gap size of minimal dissipation closer to the zero pressure point? Is there a notable speed dependence?
  • How big is the gap typically just before the situation gets unstable?

(TODO: Answer above questions.)

(wiki-TODO: add a sketch to illustrate the situation)
(wiki-TODO: illustrate the range between where negative pressure starts and where the situation becones unstable via lennard jones potential and its first and second derivatives)

Related

Going the opposite way:

Macroscale engineering terms like "press fit" may not be too well usable for strained shell bearings. Even slightly undersized undersized press fits might still suck axles in due to VdW force maximizung surface contact area.