Difference between revisions of "Machine-phase chemistry"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(basic page)
 
(added links to 4 related pages)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
----
 
----
 
* [[Tooltip chemistry]] (not necessarily force applying)
 
* [[Tooltip chemistry]] (not necessarily force applying)
* [[Piezomechanochemistry]] (not [[Piezochemistry]])
+
* [[Piezomechanochemistry]] (not [[Piezochemistry]]!!) with the two cases of: <br>[[Piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] and [[Chemomechanical converter]]s
* [[Chemomechanical converter]]
+
 
----
 
----
 
* [[Mechanosynthesis core]]
 
* [[Mechanosynthesis core]]
Line 29: Line 28:
 
----
 
----
 
* [[Tooltip cycle]]
 
* [[Tooltip cycle]]
 +
* [[A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (paper)]]
 +
* [[List of proposed tooltips for diamond mechanosynthesis]]
 
----
 
----
 +
* [[Resource molecules]]
 
* [[Positional assembly]]
 
* [[Positional assembly]]

Revision as of 15:25, 8 June 2023

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

Guiding reactive moieties along tightly controlled paths …

  • can largely suppress unwanted side reactions
  • can largely increase rates for the actually desired reaction (higher effective concentration)

Generally this guiding …

  • reduces the spacial density (spacial frequency) of active reaction sites
  • increases the temporal frequency (temporal density) of reaction events

The latter must and can overcompensate in for the loss in the former.

Actively applying force can accelerate reactions further in some cases.
In some cases applied force can slow down reactions though. See: Inter system crossing.
Higly exoergic >>kT reactions with no energy recuperation will typically happen fast.
Energy recuperation (and maybe even dissipation sharing to squeez out as much efficiency as possible)
will change reaction range rates in nontrivial ways.

Related