Difference between revisions of "Intuitively understanding the size of an atom"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
m (→‎Why this works: hunamn => human -- typofix)
m
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
If you build a humongous model of a human hair with a diameter equivalent to the width of a soccer field (~50m), <br>
 
If you build a humongous model of a human hair with a diameter equivalent to the width of a soccer field (~50m), <br>
−
then the model carbon atoms in that humongous model of a human are pretty exactly the size of a human hair (~0.1mm).
+
then the model carbon atoms in that humongous model of a human are pretty much exactly the size of a human hair (~0.1mm).
  
 
The carbon atoms in the real hair (and everywhere else) are about ~0.2nm in diameter.
 
The carbon atoms in the real hair (and everywhere else) are about ~0.2nm in diameter.

Revision as of 20:45, 20 April 2024

Pluck yourself a Hair and look at it. Imagine a magnified model of the torn of end was built. Would be interesting – wouldn't it? This model was buried halfway such that it runs vertically into ground at the sidelines and that it reaches twenty-five meters of dome-height at the center of the play-field. When you stand on this soccer field in front of the fractured surface and you hold a real hair against tremendous model then you see: The model-atoms of the giant hair have the diameter of a real hair.

If you build a humongous model of a human hair with a diameter equivalent to the width of a soccer field (~50m),
then the model carbon atoms in that humongous model of a human are pretty much exactly the size of a human hair (~0.1mm).

The carbon atoms in the real hair (and everywhere else) are about ~0.2nm in diameter.

It's the same ratio!

  • 50m / 0.1mm = 500 000
  • 0.1mm / 0.2nm = 500 000

See?

Why this works

Unlike other comparisons this for once works because
the size of a hair and the size of a soccer-field both
still fall into the range of our everyday human experience.

What not to do

Shift one side of the comparison a bit (like making model atoms the size of marbles ~1cm) and
the other side falls way out of human everyday experience (model hair 5km diameter).
The comparison becomes completely useless as a means for intuitive understanding.

Also choose one magnification level and stick with it for as much as possible. Do not jump around with magnification levels wildly.

Related

Retrieved from "http://apm.bplaced.net/w/index.php?title=Intuitively_understanding_the_size_of_an_atom&oldid=16323"