Difference between revisions of "Energy recuperation"
From apm
m |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''Potential waste heat increasing factors:''' | '''Potential waste heat increasing factors:''' | ||
| − | * Higher energy turnover due to more surface area broken open and reformed again | + | * Higher energy turnover due to more surface area broken open and reformed again compared to assembly on higher [[assembly level]]s |
* Higher energy turnover due to [[covalent bonds]] being significantly stronger than [[Van der Waals bonds]] | * Higher energy turnover due to [[covalent bonds]] being significantly stronger than [[Van der Waals bonds]] | ||
* Possibly less highly optimizable for efficiency due to localized high strains being unavoidable – (related: [[back driving]] a gear-train) | * Possibly less highly optimizable for efficiency due to localized high strains being unavoidable – (related: [[back driving]] a gear-train) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:57, 13 June 2021
Energy recuperation on the single bond level
- energy recuperation in piezochemical mechanosynthesis
- energy recuperation in the drive subsystem of a gem-gum factory – e.g. in chemomechanical conversion
See: Dissipation sharing – (Related: Exothermy offloading)
Potential waste heat increasing factors:
- Higher energy turnover due to more surface area broken open and reformed again compared to assembly on higher assembly levels
- Higher energy turnover due to covalent bonds being significantly stronger than Van der Waals bonds
- Possibly less highly optimizable for efficiency due to localized high strains being unavoidable – (related: back driving a gear-train)
Energy recuperation on small scales
- energy recuperation from Van der Waals bonds
- energy recuperation from superelastic clips, avoiding larger scale snapback
