Terminology

From apm
Revision as of 09:38, 30 August 2022 by Apm (Talk | contribs) (basic page)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

Related

Delineation to nomenclature

  • Terminology … about single words
  • Nomenclature … systematic naming schemes (like naming molecules, or sets of similar engineering parts)

What makes great terminology

Avoid terminology collisions!! Instead seek white spaces on the terminology map.

  • collision/conflict-free
  • novel/unique

Major search engine conjures or no results. Or few that cover a highly unrelated topics.
Avoid competition with existing terminology especially for topics similar in nature

Seek catchy terminology!
But what does tha even mean?
catchy = clickbaity + memorizable

Seek unannexable terminology that can hardly be stolen away.

  • decriptive – putting sufficiently descriptive elements into the term can
    make it hard to impossible for competing concepts adopt the same terms, and thus they cannot drown out search results. – strongly avoid to use things as generic as "nanotech"

Seek strongly curiosity-sparking terminology, clickbaity terminology.

  • mental dissonance causing, baffling on first sight – e.g. transparent aluminum

Seek memoritzable terminology!

  • spellable (by target audience) – avoid a slew of consecutive consonants - no "qtpfsgui"
  • brief

Seek humorous terminology!

  • humorous, good-kind-of-odd

Example

gem-gum-tec

  • collisionfree & novel – yes, till 2022 at least
  • descriptive – yes see: Gem-gum
  • baffling – yes, Hopefully achieved aim is to sparking the question:
    How the heck can gum (rubber) be made from gem (gemstone)?
    Resolved in the expanded terminology "gemstone metamaterial technology"
  • spellable – yes, no consecutive consonants
  • brief – yes, obviously
  • humorous – maybe? gem-gum sounds a bit funny/silly – reader may judge