Difference between revisions of "Talk:Convergent mechanical actuation"
From apm
m (Apm moved page Talk:Confluence of mechanical actuation to Talk:Convergent mechanical actuation: generally seems better terminology) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Actually | Actually | ||
| − | * " | + | * (1) "''Convergent mechanical actuation''" may be even better of a term than |
| − | * " | + | * (2) "''Confluence of mechanical actuation''" since it matches up with "[[convergent assembly]]" – this is not related though |
| − | * " | + | * (3) "''Confluent mechanical actuation''" would also have been an option in between |
Hmm ... <br> | Hmm ... <br> | ||
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 19:50, 18 May 2021 (CEST) | [[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 19:50, 18 May 2021 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Settled for option (1). <br> | ||
| + | [[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 15:32, 23 May 2021 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:32, 23 May 2021
Actually
- (1) "Convergent mechanical actuation" may be even better of a term than
- (2) "Confluence of mechanical actuation" since it matches up with "convergent assembly" – this is not related though
- (3) "Confluent mechanical actuation" would also have been an option in between
Hmm ...
Apm (talk) 19:50, 18 May 2021 (CEST)
Settled for option (1).
Apm (talk) 15:32, 23 May 2021 (CEST)
