Difference between revisions of "Bottom-up Top-down overlap"
From apm
m |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The idea here is getting | The idea here is getting | ||
| − | * the largest size of bottom up assemblable structures sufficiently above | + | * the largest size of bottom-up assemblable structures sufficiently above |
| − | * the smallest size of top down manufacturable structures such | + | * the smallest size of top-down manufacturable structures such |
that the two can be made to interact in a controllable fashion. | that the two can be made to interact in a controllable fashion. | ||
Revision as of 19:42, 12 March 2021
The idea here is getting
- the largest size of bottom-up assemblable structures sufficiently above
- the smallest size of top-down manufacturable structures such
that the two can be made to interact in a controllable fashion.
Examples
- Aligning self-assembled structures in/on photolithographically created structures
- Grabbing bottom-up self-assembled structures by MEMS tweezers
- What about Exponential assembly that involves both top-down manufactured and self-assembled bottom up manufactured structures?
- ...
Side-note: Manipulating self assembled structures with an SPM tip
(possible with another bottom-up self-assembled structure attached)
does not really involve a top down tech part.
