Difference between revisions of "Concrete"
From apm
(basic skeleton for page) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:36, 1 August 2018
- pros: cheap
- cons: crude, just structural, just compression
In erection and removal: not reversible without destruction (exception loose interlocking concrete tiles), dusty, loud, time and energy intensive, big CO2 emittant
- Common minerals in "concretes" like CaCO3 maybe interesting for atomically precise mechanosynthesis
Exotic forms of "concrete"
- Lime plaster (*)
- Gypsum plaster
- Sorel-cement (Magnesium based - very different)
- Geopolymers
- ...
Related
External links
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calcium_oxide
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cement
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portland_cement
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plaster#Gypsum_plaster
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorel_cement
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geopolymer
- (de) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silikattechnologie
- (de) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technischer_Kalkkreislauf
