Difference between revisions of "Increasing bearing area to decrease friction"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(some cleanup)
m (The trick)
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
'''Q:''' But isn't doubling the amount of machinery a problem? <br>
 
'''Q:''' But isn't doubling the amount of machinery a problem? <br>
'''A:''' No! <br>
+
'''A:''' No! There is exceptionally little machinery needed to  <br>
There is exceptionally little machinery needed to  <br>
+
 
get practical levels of throughput (aka product production rate). <br>
 
get practical levels of throughput (aka product production rate). <br>
 
This is due to the [[scaling law]] of [[higher throughput of smaller machinery]].
 
This is due to the [[scaling law]] of [[higher throughput of smaller machinery]].

Revision as of 12:58, 28 August 2022

Friction in atomically precise diamondoid slide bearings ...

  • is dominated by dynamic friction
    which scales quadratically with speed:
    1/2x speed => 1/4x friction | 1/10x speed => 1/100x friction
  • is proportional to the bearing area (2x area => 2x friction)

For details see: Friction

Side-note:
Low speed friction in macroscale bearings is quite different as it is
speed independent, area independent, load dependent.

The trick

This allows for a neat trick:

  • Halving speed and
  • doubling machinery

(this keeps the total throughput constant) leads to

  • quartering friction losses due to reduced bearing speed
  • doubling friction losses due to increased bearing area

Overall a halving of friction.

Q: But isn't doubling the amount of machinery a problem?
A: No! There is exceptionally little machinery needed to
get practical levels of throughput (aka product production rate).
This is due to the scaling law of higher throughput of smaller machinery.

Limits to the trick

See math on main page: Limits to lower friction despite higher bearing area

  • assembly motions can be slowed down by adding more sub layers.
  • transport motions can not be slowed by adding more sub layers.

At some point assembly motions reach become similarly slow as the assembly motions.
At this point adding further sub-layers there is no further reduction of frictive losses but rather frictive losses ride again. (eventually linearly).

Applications cases

Related