Difference between revisions of "Informal laws"
From apm
m |
(added "Musk's 5 step design process") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | == "Laws" == | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity (weak) Linguistic relativity, aka Sapir–Whorf hypothesis] – '''"Linguistic categories and usage influence thought and decisions."''' | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity (weak) Linguistic relativity, aka Sapir–Whorf hypothesis] – '''"Linguistic categories and usage influence thought and decisions."''' | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law Goodhart's law] – Generalization by Marilyn Strathern: '''"When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."''' | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goodhart%27s_law Goodhart's law] – Generalization by Marilyn Strathern: '''"When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."''' | ||
| − | + | ||
| + | == Principles == | ||
| + | |||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_follows_function Form follows function] – When the shape of an object primarily relates to its intended function or purpose. <br>This is usually the result when designing at the limit of what's possible under tight constraints. <br>When the limits imposed by physical law leads to the emergent discovery of the shape of a technical artifact. | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Form_follows_function Form follows function] – When the shape of an object primarily relates to its intended function or purpose. <br>This is usually the result when designing at the limit of what's possible under tight constraints. <br>When the limits imposed by physical law leads to the emergent discovery of the shape of a technical artifact. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_for_manufacturability Design for manufacturability (DFM)] – The general engineering practice of designing products in such a way that they are easy to manufacture. | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_for_manufacturability Design for manufacturability (DFM)] – The general engineering practice of designing products in such a way that they are easy to manufacture. | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Musk's 5 step design process: | ||
| + | * (1/5) Sanity check specifications / requirements. Do they even make sense? | ||
| + | * (2/5) Delete / add-in part of the process. – "The best part is no part." | ||
| + | * (3/5) simplify / optimize | ||
| + | * (4/5) accelerate cycle-time | ||
| + | * (5/5) automate | ||
| + | Avoid doing the whole sequence in reverse. | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
* [[What we can X depends on what we can Y]] | * [[What we can X depends on what we can Y]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == External links == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Youtube - Musk's 5 step design process: [https://youtu.be/t705r8ICkRw?t=13m24s Starbase Tour with Elon Musk [PART 1]] | ||
Revision as of 11:22, 13 August 2021
Contents
"Laws"
- (weak) Linguistic relativity, aka Sapir–Whorf hypothesis – "Linguistic categories and usage influence thought and decisions."
- Conway's law – "Any organization that designs a system (defined broadly) will produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization's communication structure." — Melvin E. Conway
- "Drexlers law" – "What we can do depends on what we can make."
- Goodhart's law – Generalization by Marilyn Strathern: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."
Principles
- Form follows function – When the shape of an object primarily relates to its intended function or purpose.
This is usually the result when designing at the limit of what's possible under tight constraints.
When the limits imposed by physical law leads to the emergent discovery of the shape of a technical artifact.
- Design for manufacturability (DFM) – The general engineering practice of designing products in such a way that they are easy to manufacture.
Musk's 5 step design process:
- (1/5) Sanity check specifications / requirements. Do they even make sense?
- (2/5) Delete / add-in part of the process. – "The best part is no part."
- (3/5) simplify / optimize
- (4/5) accelerate cycle-time
- (5/5) automate
Avoid doing the whole sequence in reverse.
Related
External links
- Youtube - Musk's 5 step design process: Starbase Tour with Elon Musk [PART 1]
