Difference between revisions of "Nanoscale style machinery at the macroscale"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(minimal basic page)
 
Line 7: Line 7:
 
* much larger distances
 
* much larger distances
 
* => much much lower random part encounter rates  
 
* => much much lower random part encounter rates  
To get an intuitive feel see page: [[The speed of atoms]]
+
The encounter rate of small molecule sized parts at the nanoscale due to thermal motion is mindbogglingly high. <br>
 +
To get an intuitive feel about just how much macroscale is at a disadvantage see page: [[The speed of atoms]]
 +
 
 +
This obstacle can be hit when scaling [[termination control]] and [[site addressability]] in <br>
 +
technologies that use [[thermally driven self-assembly]] to raher large scales. <br>
 +
Like e.g. already the casein the higher [[selfassembly level]]s of [[structural DNA nanotechnology]].
  
 
== Related ==
 
== Related ==

Revision as of 13:02, 18 May 2022

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

This page is about using the principles of natural nanomachinery (main focus self assembly by movement driven through intense shaking) for assembly at the macroscale.

Main obstacles:

  • much lower speeds – typically much below the speed of sound
  • much larger distances
  • => much much lower random part encounter rates

The encounter rate of small molecule sized parts at the nanoscale due to thermal motion is mindbogglingly high.
To get an intuitive feel about just how much macroscale is at a disadvantage see page: The speed of atoms

This obstacle can be hit when scaling termination control and site addressability in
technologies that use thermally driven self-assembly to raher large scales.
Like e.g. already the casein the higher selfassembly levels of structural DNA nanotechnology.

Related


  • Scaling law – selfassembly driven by shaking (even if artificially introduced) scales badly to the macroscale