Difference between revisions of "Macroscale surface passivation"
(→Reated: added * Passivation (disambiguation)) |
m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Almost all metals except the most noble ones form more or less <br> | Almost all metals except the most noble ones form more or less <br> | ||
stable protective oxide layers on their surfaces when <br> | stable protective oxide layers on their surfaces when <br> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 33: | ||
compared to what we now have with anodizing. See related page: [[Inert shell thickness]]. <br> | compared to what we now have with anodizing. See related page: [[Inert shell thickness]]. <br> | ||
[[Emulated elasticity]] could massively increase the toughness of protective layers while still retaining high hardness. <br> | [[Emulated elasticity]] could massively increase the toughness of protective layers while still retaining high hardness. <br> | ||
| − | This could make surfaces that are for all practically | + | This could make surfaces that are for all practically purposes unscratchable by accident. <br> |
And that still feel hard and glassy rather than plasticy. | And that still feel hard and glassy rather than plasticy. | ||
| Line 54: | Line 52: | ||
macroscopic [[gem-gum products]] and thus well protected from things like oxygen. | macroscopic [[gem-gum products]] and thus well protected from things like oxygen. | ||
| − | == | + | == Related == |
* [[Passivation (disambiguation)]] | * [[Passivation (disambiguation)]] | ||
| Line 63: | Line 61: | ||
* [[Inert shell thickness of gem-gum products]] | * [[Inert shell thickness of gem-gum products]] | ||
* [[Inner compartmentalization of gem-gum products]] | * [[Inner compartmentalization of gem-gum products]] | ||
| + | * [[Skin]] – (potentially misleading bio-analogy) – [[Gem-gum housing shell]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:06, 21 June 2021
Almost all metals except the most noble ones form more or less
stable protective oxide layers on their surfaces when
exposed to oxygen and eventually also moisture possibly with salts dissolved.
There are very few exceptions including e.g. Gold.
Even the quite noble metals copper and silver quickly form passivation layers on their surfaces
when observed at the nanoscale.
Contents
Did you know? You never have actually touched a metal. (well almost)
When we touch metals what we touch are actually the protective oxide layers on their surfaces.
Not actually the metals themselves.
What gemstone you actually touch when you touch a metal you can look up on this page here:
Passivation layer mineral.
The only other thing than a passivation layer mineral that you may unknowingly touch when
touching what seems like a metal is a layer of clear (organic) lacquer.
Passivation layer formation on more noble metals
More nobles metals like copper and silver react with other things present in the atmosphere than oxygen to a good part.
E.g. the carbon dioxide and some traces of sulfur oxides in the atmosphere.
Artificial macroscale passivation layers
When the oxide layers are intentionally artificially thickened (for optical and or protective effect)
e.g. by anodizing (but there are other means too) then
the passivation layer mineral is easily optically visibly, sometimes in bright iridescent colors
due to interference effects of the light with the thin
transparent oxide layer.
By means of production via gem-gum on-chip factories way better thin protective layers will be producible
compared to what we now have with anodizing. See related page: Inert shell thickness.
Emulated elasticity could massively increase the toughness of protective layers while still retaining high hardness.
This could make surfaces that are for all practically purposes unscratchable by accident.
And that still feel hard and glassy rather than plasticy.
High speed of layer formation and buildup to high thickness from the nano perspective
The naturally forming protective oxide layers are often thin enough to be optically transparent.
Especially when still young on very freshly created surfaces (by breaking, casting or deforming).
But the first atomic layers of oxides usually build up extremely fast.
This would be devastating for exposed nanomachinery made from metal.
So there won't be such a thing.
Relation to nanoscale passivation
Nanoscale parts made from metals or alloys rather than made from already oxidized gemstone
would in most cases quickly oxidize when exposed to air forming a thick imperfect oxide layer that is thicker than
the whole part itself and thus destroying the part.
Most nanomachinery will be well encapsulated and located inside of
macroscopic gem-gum products and thus well protected from things like oxygen.
