Difference between revisions of "Rutile structure"
From apm
(added link to yet unwritten page: Simple crystal structures of especial interest) |
m (→Related) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Crystal structure: tetragonal | ||
| − | Various compounds that all share the rutile structure and thus may be amenable to patterned | + | == List of compounds with rutile structure == |
| + | |||
| + | Various compounds that all share the rutile structure and thus <br> | ||
| + | may be amenable to patterned substitution by atoms of compatible elements thereby <br> | ||
| + | spanning up new areas of [[pseudo phase diagram]]s <br> | ||
(here ordered by elemental abundance in earths crust): | (here ordered by elemental abundance in earths crust): | ||
| − | * [[Stishovite]] SiO<sub>2</sub> - not quartz - (Mohs 9.5 | silicon is the most common element on earth excluding oxygen) - 4.35g/ccm - heat resistance may be limited due to metastability | + | * '''[[Stishovite]] SiO<sub>2</sub>''' - not quartz - ('''Mohs 9.5''' | silicon is the most common element on earth excluding oxygen) - 4.35g/ccm - heat resistance may be limited due to metastability |
* '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutile Rutile] TiO<sub>2</sub> (Mohs 6-6.5 | titanium is very abundant)''' | * '''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rutile Rutile] TiO<sub>2</sub> (Mohs 6-6.5 | titanium is very abundant)''' | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolusite Pyrolusite] MnO<sub>2</sub> (Mohs 6-6.5 | Mn is not too rare but todays mining is environmentally destructive) | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrolusite Pyrolusite] MnO<sub>2</sub> (Mohs 6-6.5 | Mn is not too rare but todays mining is environmentally destructive) | ||
| Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argutite Argutite] GeO<sub>2</sub> (Mohs 6-7 | germanium is pretty rare) | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argutite Argutite] GeO<sub>2</sub> (Mohs 6-7 | germanium is pretty rare) | ||
| − | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripuhyite Tripuhyite] FeSbO<sub>4</sub> (Mohs 6-7 | Antimony Sb is a little more rare than germanium Ge.<br> The much more common phosphorus analog FePO<sub>4</sub> forms a soft hydroxide [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strengite Strengite] with different crystal structure) | + | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripuhyite Tripuhyite] FeSbO<sub>4</sub> (Mohs 6-7 | Antimony Sb is a little more rare than germanium Ge.)<br> The much more common phosphorus analog FePO<sub>4</sub> forms a soft hydroxide [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strengite Strengite] with different crystal structure (phosphate). <br>But maybe it can be mechanosynthesized in rutile structure? |
* [https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paratellurit Paratellurit (de)] TeO<sub>2</sub> (soft compound and tellurium is extremely rare) | * [https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paratellurit Paratellurit (de)] TeO<sub>2</sub> (soft compound and tellurium is extremely rare) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | * MgF<sub>2</sub> [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnesium_fluoride Magnesium fluoride] mineral [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sellaite sellaite] – Mohs 5.0 to 5.5 – 3.15g/ccm – very slightly soluble in water (0.13g/liter) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == A special focus on Stishovite? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''[[Stishovite]] may be of especial interest''' because <br> | ||
| + | of the abundance of [[silicon]] and because <br> | ||
| + | of its better qualities than quartz like: | ||
| + | * way higher hardness | ||
| + | * the rutile structure being simpler and higer symmetry than the quartz structure | ||
| + | * denser structure with less voids | ||
| + | It may not be very heat resistant though, since it is only metastable at low pressures. To determine. <br> | ||
| + | Element substitutions with the elements from the compounds listed above may improve on heat stability while possibly degrading other properties. <br> | ||
| + | Maybe a tradeoff? Maybe a win-win? | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
| + | * [[Rutile]] | ||
| + | * [[Polymorphs of silicon dioxide]] | ||
* [[Silicon]] | * [[Silicon]] | ||
* [[Simple crystal structures of especial interest]] | * [[Simple crystal structures of especial interest]] | ||
Latest revision as of 09:39, 22 January 2022
Crystal structure: tetragonal
List of compounds with rutile structure
Various compounds that all share the rutile structure and thus
may be amenable to patterned substitution by atoms of compatible elements thereby
spanning up new areas of pseudo phase diagrams
(here ordered by elemental abundance in earths crust):
- Stishovite SiO2 - not quartz - (Mohs 9.5 | silicon is the most common element on earth excluding oxygen) - 4.35g/ccm - heat resistance may be limited due to metastability
- Rutile TiO2 (Mohs 6-6.5 | titanium is very abundant)
- Pyrolusite MnO2 (Mohs 6-6.5 | Mn is not too rare but todays mining is environmentally destructive)
- Niobium dioxide = Niob(IV)-oxid NbO2
- Cassierite SnO2 (Mohs 6-7)
- Plattnerite β-PbO2 (Mohs 5.5 unusually hard for a lead compound | useful high density of ~9 g/cm3)
- Note that lead Pb tin Sn and niobium Nb are similar in their not too high abundance.
- Argutite GeO2 (Mohs 6-7 | germanium is pretty rare)
- Tripuhyite FeSbO4 (Mohs 6-7 | Antimony Sb is a little more rare than germanium Ge.)
The much more common phosphorus analog FePO4 forms a soft hydroxide Strengite with different crystal structure (phosphate).
But maybe it can be mechanosynthesized in rutile structure? - Paratellurit (de) TeO2 (soft compound and tellurium is extremely rare)
- MgF2 Magnesium fluoride mineral sellaite – Mohs 5.0 to 5.5 – 3.15g/ccm – very slightly soluble in water (0.13g/liter)
A special focus on Stishovite?
Stishovite may be of especial interest because
of the abundance of silicon and because
of its better qualities than quartz like:
- way higher hardness
- the rutile structure being simpler and higer symmetry than the quartz structure
- denser structure with less voids
It may not be very heat resistant though, since it is only metastable at low pressures. To determine.
Element substitutions with the elements from the compounds listed above may improve on heat stability while possibly degrading other properties.
Maybe a tradeoff? Maybe a win-win?
