Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gemstone-like molecular element"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(request for page separation / splitup)
(added notes on eventual change of terminology)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
TODO:
+
'''Current situation:'''
 +
* [[Crystolecule]] aka [[Gemstone-like molecular element]] – gem-like (including diamondoid) – smaller single part
 +
* [[Crystolecular element]] – gem-like (including diamondoid) – bigger multipart
 +
* [[Diamondoid crystolecule]] – only diamondoid – smaller single part
 +
* [[Diamondoid crystolecular machine element]] – only diamondoid – bigger multipart
 +
'''Terminology needs to be made more consistent!!''' <br>
 +
Maybe like so (with same order respectively):
 +
* [[Crystolecule]] – (these are always gemstone-like
 +
* [[Crystolecular compound element]]
 +
* [[Diamondoid crystolecule]]
 +
* [[Diamondoid crystolecular compound element]]
 +
"Compound" as in "constituted out of several disjunct parts". <br>
 +
'''Also this needs a Venn diagram!''' <br>
 +
 
 +
Two dimensions with each two options make four cases:
 +
* diamondoid or not
 +
* compound element or single part
 +
For now keep eventual discussions of the other two possible dimensions on page.
 +
* structural-element vs machine-element dimension and
 +
* size-scale dimension
 +
 
 +
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 18:45, 9 August 2021 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
-----
 +
'''New problem:''' <br>
 +
"Molecular machine elements" may consist out of several "crystolecules". <br>
 +
That is a single "Molecular machine elements" may not be a single monolithic fully covalently connected "crystolecule block" <br>
 +
but instead by a reversibly or irreversibly shape locked conglomerate of "crystolecules". <br>
 +
Thus some parts of this pages need to be split off. <br>
 +
 
 +
The question is: Where should the existing links be redirected to? I guess:
 +
* existing links should generally stay directed to "Gemstone-like molecular element".
 +
* current links Links to "crystolecule" should be replaced by "gem-gum element"
 +
* "crystolecule" should become a new page that describes individual non-covalently bonded parts of "Gemstone-like molecular machine elements"
 +
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 11:26, 9 April 2021 (CEST)
 +
-----
 +
 
 +
'''TODO:'''
 
Discuss separability of structural elements and machine elements
 
Discuss separability of structural elements and machine elements
 
* sigma bond bearing as machine element ...
 
* sigma bond bearing as machine element ...

Latest revision as of 17:45, 9 August 2021

Current situation:

Terminology needs to be made more consistent!!
Maybe like so (with same order respectively):

"Compound" as in "constituted out of several disjunct parts".
Also this needs a Venn diagram!

Two dimensions with each two options make four cases:

  • diamondoid or not
  • compound element or single part

For now keep eventual discussions of the other two possible dimensions on page.

  • structural-element vs machine-element dimension and
  • size-scale dimension

Apm (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2021 (CEST)


New problem:
"Molecular machine elements" may consist out of several "crystolecules".
That is a single "Molecular machine elements" may not be a single monolithic fully covalently connected "crystolecule block"
but instead by a reversibly or irreversibly shape locked conglomerate of "crystolecules".
Thus some parts of this pages need to be split off.

The question is: Where should the existing links be redirected to? I guess:

  • existing links should generally stay directed to "Gemstone-like molecular element".
  • current links Links to "crystolecule" should be replaced by "gem-gum element"
  • "crystolecule" should become a new page that describes individual non-covalently bonded parts of "Gemstone-like molecular machine elements"

Apm (talk) 11:26, 9 April 2021 (CEST)


TODO: Discuss separability of structural elements and machine elements

  • sigma bond bearing as machine element ...
  • machine element parts ar structural elements ...

Move machine elements and structural elements out on their own pages

  • page becomes too long
  • wanted to reference those two separately from outside repeatedly