Difference between revisions of "Routing layer"
From apm
m |
(→Related: added some related page links) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
| + | [[File:Redundant routing zone final.svg|400px|thumb|right|Conceptual cross-section through an [[assembly level]] of a [[gem-gum]] factory with an especial focus on [[routing layer]].]] | ||
* [[Crystolecule routing layer]] | * [[Crystolecule routing layer]] | ||
* [[Microcomponent routing layer]] | * [[Microcomponent routing layer]] | ||
* routing layers further up | * routing layers further up | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Delineation of the concept == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Routing layer]]s are not to confuse with [[transport channel]]s! <br> | ||
| + | Unlike routing layers which are wedged between (but can still be counted to) [[assembly levels]], <br> | ||
| + | transport channels lead into- or out-of assembly levels that have more than one single of [[sub layers]] <br> | ||
| + | (for the sake of picking an optimal [[compenslow]] design parameter). <br> | ||
| + | See: Deprecated terminology: [[Transport layer]]s | ||
| + | |||
| + | == On the choice of association with the upstream (below) assembly layer == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Te routing layer above an assembly layer is chosen to be <br> | ||
| + | counted to the same [[assembly layer]] because it is closer in scale than the routinglayer below. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is basically because: <br> | ||
| + | Machinery for routing does not need to be (and should not be) much bigger than the parts being routed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Related == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Redundancy]] <br>fail stop producer, fail stop consumer, redundant network topology, ... | ||
| + | * [[Transportation and transmission]] | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | * [[Gemstone metamaterial on chip factory]] | ||
| + | * [[Design of gem-gum on-chip factories]] | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | * [[Assembly layer]], [[sub-layer]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == External links == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Macroscopic analogies: | ||
| + | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_yard Classification yard] ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_yard Rail yard]) or "shunting station" | ||
| + | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunting_(rail) Shunting (rail)] | ||
[[Category:Nanofactory]] | [[Category:Nanofactory]] | ||
[[Category:Technology level III]] | [[Category:Technology level III]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:12, 28 August 2022
Conceptual cross-section through an assembly level of a gem-gum factory with an especial focus on routing layer.
- Crystolecule routing layer
- Microcomponent routing layer
- routing layers further up
Contents
Delineation of the concept
Routing layers are not to confuse with transport channels!
Unlike routing layers which are wedged between (but can still be counted to) assembly levels,
transport channels lead into- or out-of assembly levels that have more than one single of sub layers
(for the sake of picking an optimal compenslow design parameter).
See: Deprecated terminology: Transport layers
On the choice of association with the upstream (below) assembly layer
Te routing layer above an assembly layer is chosen to be
counted to the same assembly layer because it is closer in scale than the routinglayer below.
This is basically because:
Machinery for routing does not need to be (and should not be) much bigger than the parts being routed.
Related
- Redundancy
fail stop producer, fail stop consumer, redundant network topology, ... - Transportation and transmission
External links
Macroscopic analogies:
- Classification yard (Rail yard) or "shunting station"
- Shunting (rail)
