Difference between revisions of "Stiffest possible infill"
(basic page) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
no planes are coplanar to the print-bed. <br> | no planes are coplanar to the print-bed. <br> | ||
This is on the cost of a bit of the symmetry of the whole block. | This is on the cost of a bit of the symmetry of the whole block. | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{wikitodo|Add images}} | ||
== Misc == | == Misc == | ||
Trademarked by some party as "isomax". | Trademarked by some party as "isomax". | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Related == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Octet truss]] | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
Latest revision as of 14:47, 17 June 2023
Provenly stiffest possible infill!
This paper:
"Mechanical metamaterials at the theoretical limit of isotropic elastic stiffness".
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature21075
doi: 10.1038/nature21075
The foam achieves the so called Hashin-Shtrikman upper bounds on isotropic elastic stiffness.
There may be other foams that perform equally well but there provenly cannot be any foams that perform better.
This could be used as an infill. Both
for today's 3D printing and
for future piezomechanosynthesized structures.
It is a superposition of simple cubic infill with an
octahedral infill (octet truss with filled in faces) of halve the size.
A "cubic-octahedral" infill - so to say.
For overhang free FFF-prnting (or mechanosynthesis)
The orientation can be chosen such, that
no planes are coplanar to the print-bed.
This is on the cost of a bit of the symmetry of the whole block.
(wiki-TODO: Add images)
Misc
Trademarked by some party as "isomax".
Related
External links
- https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2797168 – stiffest possible infill – by mechadense February 17, 2018
- https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:2168370 – Cubic Octet Foam Element – by hmikelson March 10, 2017
Related discussion:
(sorry, sunsetted) https://plus.google.com/+NicholasSeward/posts/hDYhP91YNph
