Difference between revisions of "Tooltip cycle"
(basic page) |
(added two sections) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Link to *.graphml file (can be edited with yEd): <br>https://sci-nanotech.com/wbb/converted_files/252=12-yEd-tooltip-cycle-graph_v1.00.graphml | * Link to *.graphml file (can be edited with yEd): <br>https://sci-nanotech.com/wbb/converted_files/252=12-yEd-tooltip-cycle-graph_v1.00.graphml | ||
| − | == | + | = Beyond mechanosynthesis of diamond = |
| + | |||
| + | There are many other gemstone like materials beyond [[diamond]] that are also of interest. <br> | ||
| + | See: [[Base materials with high potential]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Lattice scaled stiffness]] | ||
| + | * [[Dissipation sharing]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Silicon & silicon carbide == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Silicon may be easier to mechanosynthesize as it has bigger atoms and weaker bonds. <br> | ||
| + | Though in a chain of successively weaker bonding it (to have >>kT per reaction) it is reached earlier than carbon. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Having >>kT per reaction is actually very wasteful. <br> | ||
| + | Future optimizations could reduce that significantly. <br> | ||
| + | Retain high reliability even with a dissipation <<kT per reaction <br> | ||
| + | might be possible via employing the technique of [[dissipation sharing]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Silicon carbide is superior to diamond in terms of heat resistance. <br> | ||
| + | It does not want to convert to graphite like diamond does. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Materials with higher lattice scaled stiffness than diamond == | ||
| + | |||
| + | See main page: '''[[Lattice scaled stiffness]]''' <br> | ||
| + | Pyrite (iron sulfide FeS<sub>2</sub>) and cerianite (cerium oxide CeO<sub>2</sub>) are given as examples. | ||
| + | |||
| + | = Related = | ||
* [[A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (paper)]] | * [[A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (paper)]] | ||
* [[Tooltip chemistry]] | * [[Tooltip chemistry]] | ||
| + | * [[List of proposed tooltips for diamond mechanosynthesis]] | ||
| + | * [[Piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] | ||
| + | * [[Resource molecules]] | ||
| − | + | = Meta: Issues to resolve = | |
The block diagram was originally published here back in 2015 (old version there): <br> | The block diagram was originally published here back in 2015 (old version there): <br> | ||
| − | https://sci-nanotech.com/index.php?thread/15-nanofactory-block-diagram/ | + | https://sci-nanotech.com/index.php?thread/15-nanofactory-block-diagram/ <br> |
| + | (Also there: '''[[Block diagram of a gem-gum on-chip factory]]''') | ||
{{wikitodo|resolve issues with the graphics - it was too big in pixel dimensions not file-size}}<br> | {{wikitodo|resolve issues with the graphics - it was too big in pixel dimensions not file-size}}<br> | ||
* [[File:Diamondoid-tooltip-cycle-graph.svg]] | * [[File:Diamondoid-tooltip-cycle-graph.svg]] | ||
* [[File:Diamondoid-tooltip-cycle-graph.png]] | * [[File:Diamondoid-tooltip-cycle-graph.png]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:41, 1 June 2023
In order to gain a better understanding of the degree of complexity that is involved in a minimal system for tooltip processing.
The author of this wiki made an attempt of converting all the piezomechanochemistry that is presented in the paper
"A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (paper)"
into a flowchart.
The results:
- there is significant complexity - on the limit of what can be done manually
- it's hart to get it all into one single picture
- its hard to clearly divide into educt and product side since
it's not always clearly defined what's the educt and what's the product - there likely was more - {{wikitodo| old work on tooltip-cycle-graph needs to be reviewed to point that out.
- Link to image:
https://sci-nanotech.com/wbb/converted_files/252=13-yEd-tooltip-cycle-graph_v1.00.png - Link to *.graphml file (can be edited with yEd):
https://sci-nanotech.com/wbb/converted_files/252=12-yEd-tooltip-cycle-graph_v1.00.graphml
Contents
Beyond mechanosynthesis of diamond
There are many other gemstone like materials beyond diamond that are also of interest.
See: Base materials with high potential
Silicon & silicon carbide
Silicon may be easier to mechanosynthesize as it has bigger atoms and weaker bonds.
Though in a chain of successively weaker bonding it (to have >>kT per reaction) it is reached earlier than carbon.
Having >>kT per reaction is actually very wasteful.
Future optimizations could reduce that significantly.
Retain high reliability even with a dissipation <<kT per reaction
might be possible via employing the technique of dissipation sharing.
Silicon carbide is superior to diamond in terms of heat resistance.
It does not want to convert to graphite like diamond does.
Materials with higher lattice scaled stiffness than diamond
See main page: Lattice scaled stiffness
Pyrite (iron sulfide FeS2) and cerianite (cerium oxide CeO2) are given as examples.
Related
- A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (paper)
- Tooltip chemistry
- List of proposed tooltips for diamond mechanosynthesis
- Piezochemical mechanosynthesis
- Resource molecules
Meta: Issues to resolve
The block diagram was originally published here back in 2015 (old version there):
https://sci-nanotech.com/index.php?thread/15-nanofactory-block-diagram/
(Also there: Block diagram of a gem-gum on-chip factory)
(wiki-TODO: resolve issues with the graphics - it was too big in pixel dimensions not file-size)
