Difference between revisions of "Gem-gum to natural material gap"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(basic page)
 
(added == Other crossover materials == and more)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
[[Gemstone like compounds]] and [[mechanical metamaterials]] thereof are very different to natural materials. <br>
 
[[Gemstone like compounds]] and [[mechanical metamaterials]] thereof are very different to natural materials. <br>
 
Will there be materials that are with there inner makeup somewhere in-between?
 
Will there be materials that are with there inner makeup somewhere in-between?
 +
 +
Well, this is not the target product range of [[gem-gum factories]] <br>
 +
bitgiven specialised systems will be developed (akin to the <br>
 +
specialised system for [[synthesis of food]]) then such materials might well become a reality.
 +
 +
One would probably make these materials out of
 +
* biodegradability reasons – throw the technobiowood it to the rest of the wood and treat it the same
 +
* psychological reasons – knowledge that technobiowood is very much like real wood
  
 
What should be avoided is integrating non-decomposable particulates <br>
 
What should be avoided is integrating non-decomposable particulates <br>
Line 8: Line 16:
 
That would give an environmental nightmare. See: [[Spill prevention]] and [[splinter prevention]]
 
That would give an environmental nightmare. See: [[Spill prevention]] and [[splinter prevention]]
  
== Technowood ==
+
== Technobiowood ==
  
 
There are only a finite number of species of trees on this planet but in the universe of possibilities <br>
 
There are only a finite number of species of trees on this planet but in the universe of possibilities <br>
Line 22: Line 30:
 
* more gem-gum like – Integrating slightly water dissolvable gemstome like compoungs like periclase
 
* more gem-gum like – Integrating slightly water dissolvable gemstome like compoungs like periclase
 
* more natural like – integrating de-novo proteins from earlier technology levels
 
* more natural like – integrating de-novo proteins from earlier technology levels
 +
 +
== Other crossover materials ==
 +
 +
* faking real stones
 +
* nano-woven polymers
 +
* cryogenically mechanosynthesized metallic pseudo alloys – no clue why

Revision as of 18:19, 1 June 2021

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

Gemstone like compounds and mechanical metamaterials thereof are very different to natural materials.
Will there be materials that are with there inner makeup somewhere in-between?

Well, this is not the target product range of gem-gum factories
bitgiven specialised systems will be developed (akin to the
specialised system for synthesis of food) then such materials might well become a reality.

One would probably make these materials out of

  • biodegradability reasons – throw the technobiowood it to the rest of the wood and treat it the same
  • psychological reasons – knowledge that technobiowood is very much like real wood

What should be avoided is integrating non-decomposable particulates
or fragile fibrous structures into a decomposable matrix.
That would give an environmental nightmare. See: Spill prevention and splinter prevention

Technobiowood

There are only a finite number of species of trees on this planet but in the universe of possibilities
there should be a sheer endless amount of possible types of woods.
Also some rare types of wood we really do not want to cut down (like e.g. mahagoni).

The idea:
Synthesizing artificial cellulose lignin structures.
Similar things as in synthesis of food hold.
The structures are stiffer though and not liquid posing challenges.

One can go both direction bridging the gap between the materials:

  • more gem-gum like – Integrating slightly water dissolvable gemstome like compoungs like periclase
  • more natural like – integrating de-novo proteins from earlier technology levels

Other crossover materials

  • faking real stones
  • nano-woven polymers
  • cryogenically mechanosynthesized metallic pseudo alloys – no clue why