Difference between revisions of "Bottom-up Top-down overlap"
From apm
m |
(added related section) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The idea here is getting | The idea here is getting | ||
| − | * the largest size of bottom up assemblable structures sufficiently above | + | * the largest size of bottom-up assemblable structures sufficiently above |
| − | * the smallest size of top down manufacturable structures such | + | * the smallest size of top-down manufacturable structures such |
that the two can be made to interact in a controllable fashion. | that the two can be made to interact in a controllable fashion. | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
(possible with another bottom-up self-assembled structure attached) <br> | (possible with another bottom-up self-assembled structure attached) <br> | ||
does not really involve a top down tech part. | does not really involve a top down tech part. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Related == | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[Top-down manufacturing]] | ||
| + | * [[Bottom-up manufacturing]] | ||
| + | * [[Bridging the gaps]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:53, 12 March 2021
The idea here is getting
- the largest size of bottom-up assemblable structures sufficiently above
- the smallest size of top-down manufacturable structures such
that the two can be made to interact in a controllable fashion.
Examples
- Aligning self-assembled structures in/on photolithographically created structures
- Grabbing bottom-up self-assembled structures by MEMS tweezers
- What about Exponential assembly that involves both top-down manufactured and self-assembled bottom up manufactured structures?
- ...
Side-note: Manipulating self assembled structures with an SPM tip
(possible with another bottom-up self-assembled structure attached)
does not really involve a top down tech part.
