Difference between revisions of "Self limitation for safety"
From apm
(added links to other safety pages) |
m (→Related: added back-link to page Grey goo horror fable) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Template:Stub}} | {{Template:Stub}} | ||
| − | [[File:Ugility fog chair attacks by MCKIBILLO.png|300px|thumb|right|If objects are made form specialized [[gem-gum|gemstone based metamaterials]] rather than [[utility fog]] then they fundamentally can't be hacked to do direct malicious surprise attacks. Just a self suggesting example here.]] | + | [[File:Ugility fog chair attacks by MCKIBILLO.png|300px|thumb|right|If objects are made form specialized [[gem-gum|gemstone based metamaterials]] rather than fully general purpose [[utility fog]] then they fundamentally can't be hacked to do direct malicious surprise attacks. Just a self suggesting example here.]] |
* [[Mobility prevention guideline]] | * [[Mobility prevention guideline]] | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Usage of specialised and in function limited [[diamondoid metamaterial|metamaterials]] instead of general purpouse [[utility fog]] (e.g. shelving systems). | * Usage of specialised and in function limited [[diamondoid metamaterial|metamaterials]] instead of general purpouse [[utility fog]] (e.g. shelving systems). | ||
Against [[direct physical hacking attacks]]: | Against [[direct physical hacking attacks]]: | ||
| − | * Combination lock stones as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned [[Grey goo meme|here]]. | + | * Combination [[Keysholes for microcomponent disassembly|lock stones]] as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned [[Grey goo meme|here]]. |
* Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time. | * Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time. | ||
Other: | Other: | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* [[Safety towards and with gem based APM]] | * [[Safety towards and with gem based APM]] | ||
* [[Informal laws]] | * [[Informal laws]] | ||
| + | * [[Keysholes for microcomponent disassembly]] | ||
| + | * [[Grey goo horror fable]] | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | Another case of self limiting but here not for safety but for performance: | ||
| + | * [[Consistent design for external limiting factors]] | ||
[[Category:Information]] | [[Category:Information]] | ||
[[Category:General]] | [[Category:General]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:33, 2 January 2025
If objects are made form specialized gemstone based metamaterials rather than fully general purpose utility fog then they fundamentally can't be hacked to do direct malicious surprise attacks. Just a self suggesting example here.
Against software hacking:
- Usage of specialised and in function limited metamaterials instead of general purpouse utility fog (e.g. shelving systems).
Against direct physical hacking attacks:
- Combination lock stones as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned here.
- Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time.
Other:
Related
- Safety
- Safety towards and with gem based APM
- Informal laws
- Keysholes for microcomponent disassembly
- Grey goo horror fable
Another case of self limiting but here not for safety but for performance:
