Difference between revisions of "Self limitation for safety"
From apm
(added illustrative image) |
(added links to other safety pages) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Related == | == Related == | ||
| + | * [[Safety]] | ||
| + | * [[Safety towards and with gem based APM]] | ||
* [[Informal laws]] | * [[Informal laws]] | ||
[[Category:Information]] | [[Category:Information]] | ||
[[Category:General]] | [[Category:General]] | ||
Revision as of 20:05, 23 December 2024
If objects are made form specialized gemstone based metamaterials rather than utility fog then they fundamentally can't be hacked to do direct malicious surprise attacks. Just a self suggesting example here.
Against software hacking:
- Usage of specialised and in function limited metamaterials instead of general purpouse utility fog (e.g. shelving systems).
Against direct physical hacking attacks:
- Combination lock stones as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned here.
- Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time.
Other:
