Difference between revisions of "Routing layer"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(added image YAY!)
(added note on association with the below assembly layer)
Line 12: Line 12:
 
(for the sake of picking an optimal [[compenslow]] design parameter). <br>
 
(for the sake of picking an optimal [[compenslow]] design parameter). <br>
 
See: Deprecated terminology: [[Transport layer]]s
 
See: Deprecated terminology: [[Transport layer]]s
 +
 +
== On the choice of association with the upstream (below) assembly layer ==
 +
 +
Te routing layer above an assembly layer is chosen to be <br>
 +
counted to the same [[assembly layer]] because it is closer in scale than the routinglayer below.
 +
 +
This is basically because: <br>
 +
Machinery for routing does not need to be (and should not be) much bigger than the parts being routed.
  
 
== Related ==
 
== Related ==

Revision as of 19:07, 28 August 2022

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.
Conceptual cross-section through an assembly level of a gem-gum factory with an especial focus on routing layer.

Delineation of the concept

Routing layers are not to confuse with transport channels!
Unlike routing layers which are wedged between (but can still be counted to) assembly levels,
transport channels lead into- or out-of assembly levels that have more than one single of sub layers
(for the sake of picking an optimal compenslow design parameter).
See: Deprecated terminology: Transport layers

On the choice of association with the upstream (below) assembly layer

Te routing layer above an assembly layer is chosen to be
counted to the same assembly layer because it is closer in scale than the routinglayer below.

This is basically because:
Machinery for routing does not need to be (and should not be) much bigger than the parts being routed.

Related

External links

Macroscopic analogies: