Difference between revisions of "Talk:Design levels"
From apm
m |
m |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_design - (process of defining the architecture) | * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_design - (process of defining the architecture) | ||
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_engineering - (interdisciplinary field of engineering) | * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_engineering - (interdisciplinary field of engineering) | ||
| − | + | ---- | |
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_architecture - (high level structures of a software system) | * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_architecture - (high level structures of a software system) | ||
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_design - (the process by which an agent creates a specification of a software artifact) | * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_design - (the process by which an agent creates a specification of a software artifact) | ||
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering - (application of engineering to the design, development, and maintenance of software) | * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering - (application of engineering to the design, development, and maintenance of software) | ||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_architecture - (the identification of a system's physical components and their interrelationships) | ||
| − | I think several "orthogonal" classifications | + | I think several "orthogonal" classifications ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_model view model]) need to be entangled. |
| − | + | * Product and nanofactory (architecture/...) is also intermingled. | |
| + | * nanosystems has a different classification | ||
| + | * abstract system, hardware, software intermingled | ||
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 10:31, 22 February 2014 (CET) | [[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 10:31, 22 February 2014 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 11:01, 22 February 2014
Issues
This page is a bit af a mess as it is now It is a mix of
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_architecture - (the conceptual model that defines the views of a system)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_design - (process of defining the architecture)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_engineering - (interdisciplinary field of engineering)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_architecture - (high level structures of a software system)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_design - (the process by which an agent creates a specification of a software artifact)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering - (application of engineering to the design, development, and maintenance of software)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hardware_architecture - (the identification of a system's physical components and their interrelationships)
I think several "orthogonal" classifications (view model) need to be entangled.
- Product and nanofactory (architecture/...) is also intermingled.
- nanosystems has a different classification
- abstract system, hardware, software intermingled
