Difference between revisions of "Talk:Design levels"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with " == Issues == This page is a bit af a mess as it is now It is a mix of * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_architecture * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_design * h...")
 
m
Line 5: Line 5:
 
It is a mix of
 
It is a mix of
  
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_architecture  
+
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_architecture - (the conceptual model that defines the views of a system)
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_design
+
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_design -  (process of defining the architecture)
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_engineering
+
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_engineering - (interdisciplinary field of engineering)
  
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_design
+
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_architecture - (high level structures of a software system)
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_architecture
+
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_design - (the process by which an agent creates a specification of a software artifact)
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering
+
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering - (application of engineering to the design, development, and maintenance of software)
  
 
I think several "orthogonal" classifications need to be entangled.
 
I think several "orthogonal" classifications need to be entangled.
 +
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_model
  
 
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 10:31, 22 February 2014 (CET)
 
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 10:31, 22 February 2014 (CET)

Revision as of 10:51, 22 February 2014

Issues

This page is a bit af a mess as it is now It is a mix of

I think several "orthogonal" classifications need to be entangled.

Apm (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2014 (CET)