Difference between revisions of "Tooltip cycle"

From apm
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Related: fixed typo)
m (Meta: Issues to resolve)
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
The block diagram was originally published here back in 2015 (old version there): <br>
 
The block diagram was originally published here back in 2015 (old version there): <br>
https://sci-nanotech.com/index.php?thread/15-nanofactory-block-diagram/
+
https://sci-nanotech.com/index.php?thread/15-nanofactory-block-diagram/ <br>
 +
(Also there: '''[[Block diagram of a gem-gum on-chip factory]]''')
  
 
{{wikitodo|resolve issues with the graphics - it was too big in pixel dimensions not file-size}}<br>
 
{{wikitodo|resolve issues with the graphics - it was too big in pixel dimensions not file-size}}<br>
 
* [[File:Diamondoid-tooltip-cycle-graph.svg]]
 
* [[File:Diamondoid-tooltip-cycle-graph.svg]]
 
* [[File:Diamondoid-tooltip-cycle-graph.png]]
 
* [[File:Diamondoid-tooltip-cycle-graph.png]]

Revision as of 19:06, 7 February 2022

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

In order to gain a better understanding of the degree of complexity that is involved in a minimal system for tooltip processing.
The author of this wiki made an attempt of converting all the piezomechanochemistry that is presented in the paper
"A Minimal Toolset for Positional Diamond Mechanosynthesis (paper)"
into a flowchart.

The results:

  • there is significant complexity - on the limit of what can be done manually
  • it's hart to get it all into one single picture
  • its hard to clearly divide into educt and product side since
    it's not always clearly defined what's the educt and what's the product
  • there likely was more - {{wikitodo| old work on tooltip-cycle-graph needs to be reviewed to point that out.

Related

Meta: Issues to resolve

The block diagram was originally published here back in 2015 (old version there):
https://sci-nanotech.com/index.php?thread/15-nanofactory-block-diagram/
(Also there: Block diagram of a gem-gum on-chip factory)

(wiki-TODO: resolve issues with the graphics - it was too big in pixel dimensions not file-size)