Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gemstone-like molecular element"
m (Apm moved page Talk:Diamondoid molecular element to Talk:Gemstone-like molecular element: diamondoid too narrow and a bias laden term) |
(added notes on eventual change of terminology) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | TODO: | + | '''Current situation:''' |
| + | * [[Crystolecule]] aka [[Gemstone-like molecular element]] – gem-like (including diamondoid) – smaller single part | ||
| + | * [[Crystolecular element]] – gem-like (including diamondoid) – bigger multipart | ||
| + | * [[Diamondoid crystolecule]] – only diamondoid – smaller single part | ||
| + | * [[Diamondoid crystolecular machine element]] – only diamondoid – bigger multipart | ||
| + | '''Terminology needs to be made more consistent!!''' <br> | ||
| + | Maybe like so (with same order respectively): | ||
| + | * [[Crystolecule]] – (these are always gemstone-like | ||
| + | * [[Crystolecular compound element]] | ||
| + | * [[Diamondoid crystolecule]] | ||
| + | * [[Diamondoid crystolecular compound element]] | ||
| + | "Compound" as in "constituted out of several disjunct parts". <br> | ||
| + | '''Also this needs a Venn diagram!''' <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Two dimensions with each two options make four cases: | ||
| + | * diamondoid or not | ||
| + | * compound element or single part | ||
| + | For now keep eventual discussions of the other two possible dimensions on page. | ||
| + | * structural-element vs machine-element dimension and | ||
| + | * size-scale dimension | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 18:45, 9 August 2021 (CEST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ----- | ||
| + | '''New problem:''' <br> | ||
| + | "Molecular machine elements" may consist out of several "crystolecules". <br> | ||
| + | That is a single "Molecular machine elements" may not be a single monolithic fully covalently connected "crystolecule block" <br> | ||
| + | but instead by a reversibly or irreversibly shape locked conglomerate of "crystolecules". <br> | ||
| + | Thus some parts of this pages need to be split off. <br> | ||
| + | |||
| + | The question is: Where should the existing links be redirected to? I guess: | ||
| + | * existing links should generally stay directed to "Gemstone-like molecular element". | ||
| + | * current links Links to "crystolecule" should be replaced by "gem-gum element" | ||
| + | * "crystolecule" should become a new page that describes individual non-covalently bonded parts of "Gemstone-like molecular machine elements" | ||
| + | [[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 11:26, 9 April 2021 (CEST) | ||
| + | ----- | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''TODO:''' | ||
Discuss separability of structural elements and machine elements | Discuss separability of structural elements and machine elements | ||
* sigma bond bearing as machine element ... | * sigma bond bearing as machine element ... | ||
Latest revision as of 17:45, 9 August 2021
Current situation:
- Crystolecule aka Gemstone-like molecular element – gem-like (including diamondoid) – smaller single part
- Crystolecular element – gem-like (including diamondoid) – bigger multipart
- Diamondoid crystolecule – only diamondoid – smaller single part
- Diamondoid crystolecular machine element – only diamondoid – bigger multipart
Terminology needs to be made more consistent!!
Maybe like so (with same order respectively):
- Crystolecule – (these are always gemstone-like
- Crystolecular compound element
- Diamondoid crystolecule
- Diamondoid crystolecular compound element
"Compound" as in "constituted out of several disjunct parts".
Also this needs a Venn diagram!
Two dimensions with each two options make four cases:
- diamondoid or not
- compound element or single part
For now keep eventual discussions of the other two possible dimensions on page.
- structural-element vs machine-element dimension and
- size-scale dimension
Apm (talk) 18:45, 9 August 2021 (CEST)
New problem:
"Molecular machine elements" may consist out of several "crystolecules".
That is a single "Molecular machine elements" may not be a single monolithic fully covalently connected "crystolecule block"
but instead by a reversibly or irreversibly shape locked conglomerate of "crystolecules".
Thus some parts of this pages need to be split off.
The question is: Where should the existing links be redirected to? I guess:
- existing links should generally stay directed to "Gemstone-like molecular element".
- current links Links to "crystolecule" should be replaced by "gem-gum element"
- "crystolecule" should become a new page that describes individual non-covalently bonded parts of "Gemstone-like molecular machine elements"
Apm (talk) 11:26, 9 April 2021 (CEST)
TODO: Discuss separability of structural elements and machine elements
- sigma bond bearing as machine element ...
- machine element parts ar structural elements ...
Move machine elements and structural elements out on their own pages
- page becomes too long
- wanted to reference those two separately from outside repeatedly
