Difference between revisions of "Energy recuperation"
From apm
m (→Related) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
| − | + | == Energy recuperation on the single bond level == | |
| + | |||
* energy recuperation in [[piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] | * energy recuperation in [[piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] | ||
* energy recuperation in the [[drive subsystem of a gem-gum factory]] – e.g. in [[chemomechanical conversion]] | * energy recuperation in the [[drive subsystem of a gem-gum factory]] – e.g. in [[chemomechanical conversion]] | ||
See: [[Dissipation sharing]] – (Related: [[Exothermy offloading]]) | See: [[Dissipation sharing]] – (Related: [[Exothermy offloading]]) | ||
| − | '''Energy recuperation on small scales | + | '''Potential waste heat increasing factors:''' |
| + | * Higher energy turnover due to more surface area broken open and reformed again compared to assembly on higher [[assembly level]]s | ||
| + | * Higher energy turnover due to [[covalent bonds]] being significantly stronger than [[Van der Waals bonds]] | ||
| + | * Possibly less highly optimizable for efficiency due to localized high strains being unavoidable – (related: [[back driving]] a gear-train) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Energy recuperation on small scales == | ||
| + | |||
* energy recuperation from [[Van der Waals bonds]] | * energy recuperation from [[Van der Waals bonds]] | ||
* energy recuperation from [[superelastic]] clips, avoiding larger scale [[snapback]] | * energy recuperation from [[superelastic]] clips, avoiding larger scale [[snapback]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:57, 13 June 2021
Energy recuperation on the single bond level
- energy recuperation in piezochemical mechanosynthesis
- energy recuperation in the drive subsystem of a gem-gum factory – e.g. in chemomechanical conversion
See: Dissipation sharing – (Related: Exothermy offloading)
Potential waste heat increasing factors:
- Higher energy turnover due to more surface area broken open and reformed again compared to assembly on higher assembly levels
- Higher energy turnover due to covalent bonds being significantly stronger than Van der Waals bonds
- Possibly less highly optimizable for efficiency due to localized high strains being unavoidable – (related: back driving a gear-train)
Energy recuperation on small scales
- energy recuperation from Van der Waals bonds
- energy recuperation from superelastic clips, avoiding larger scale snapback
