User contributions for Apm
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
26 April 2026
- 09:4909:49, 26 April 2026 diff hist +31 m Protein carpentry No edit summary
- 09:4909:49, 26 April 2026 diff hist +4,600 N Protein carpentry basic page
- 08:3408:34, 26 April 2026 diff hist 0 m Foldamer printer approach (incremental path) →Related current
- 08:3408:34, 26 April 2026 diff hist +101 Foldamer printer approach (incremental path) added link to yet to write page protein carpentry.
- 08:3308:33, 26 April 2026 diff hist +24 Positional assembly kinematic loop →Related: link to protein carpentry current
- 08:3208:32, 26 April 2026 diff hist +95 Functional block construction kit approach added link to yet to write page protein carpentry. current
- 08:3108:31, 26 April 2026 diff hist +95 Catalysis construction kit approach added link to et to write page Protein Carpentry current
- 08:2808:28, 26 April 2026 diff hist +100 Foldamer robot approach (incremental path) added not yet written page Protein carpentry current
25 April 2026
- 18:1518:15, 25 April 2026 diff hist +22 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Why doe is this faster / practical at all for mm/s level speeds?
- 18:1318:13, 25 April 2026 diff hist +44 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Actual quasistatic minimization
- 18:1118:11, 25 April 2026 diff hist +6 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Driving motion: Constant speed push-only virtual wall
- 18:1118:11, 25 April 2026 diff hist +6 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Driving motion: Constant speed push-only virtual wall
- 18:1118:11, 25 April 2026 diff hist +5 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Driving motion: Constant speed push-only virtual wall
- 18:1018:10, 25 April 2026 diff hist +5 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Driving motion: Constant speed push-only virtual wall
- 18:0918:09, 25 April 2026 diff hist +5 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Driving motion: Constant speed push-only virtual wall
- 18:0918:09, 25 April 2026 diff hist +94 Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Related: added * Intercrystolecular snapping modes * Constant speed source and position control
- 18:0818:08, 25 April 2026 diff hist +47 Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Driving motion: Constant speed push-only virtual wall: aded link to page Constant speed source and position control
- 18:0718:07, 25 April 2026 diff hist +62 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Smarter than an animation; Catching snap ahead instabilities
- 18:0618:06, 25 April 2026 diff hist +6 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Proposed method "sparse mainframes quasistatic push-only nanmoachine simulation"
- 18:0518:05, 25 April 2026 diff hist +25 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Other methods averting delivering a misleading intuition: more specific
- 18:0418:04, 25 April 2026 diff hist +1 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Consequences on nanomachie simualtions videos present on the web (2026)
- 18:0418:04, 25 April 2026 diff hist +121 Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Consequences on nanomachie simualtions videos present on the web (2026): improvements (?)
- 17:5917:59, 25 April 2026 diff hist 0 m Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →Consequences on nanomachie simualtions videos present on the web (2026): in => at
- 17:5917:59, 25 April 2026 diff hist +291 Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery →The limitation: improvements
- 17:4817:48, 25 April 2026 diff hist +7,464 N Why MD simulations can't simulate proposed speeds for diamondoid nanomachinery basic page
- 15:3015:30, 25 April 2026 diff hist +264 Lower stiffness of smaller machinery →Diamond in nanomachinery: Jelly soft but paradoxically wobbling less than steel in macroscale machinery: improvements
- 15:2115:21, 25 April 2026 diff hist +137 Lower stiffness of smaller machinery →Example numbers: added headlines
- 15:1815:18, 25 April 2026 diff hist +531 Lower stiffness of smaller machinery →Example numbers – Jelly indeed: added note on nanomachines not behaving like jelly
30 March 2026
- 16:2516:25, 30 March 2026 diff hist +1 Mode of assembly No edit summary current
- 16:2516:25, 30 March 2026 diff hist +58 m Mode of assembly No edit summary
- 16:0816:08, 30 March 2026 diff hist +2,115 N SPM needle tip apex to sample approach Moon landing analogy basic page current
- 14:5614:56, 30 March 2026 diff hist −1 m Local heterogeneity limits in SPM microscopy →Present challenges needing solving = current
- 14:5614:56, 30 March 2026 diff hist +31 m Local heterogeneity limits in SPM microscopy →Related: added link to * Surface molecular system
- 14:5614:56, 30 March 2026 diff hist +4 m Local heterogeneity limits in SPM microscopy →Codeposition limits (& opportunities)
- 14:5514:55, 30 March 2026 diff hist +18 m Local heterogeneity limits in SPM microscopy →Codeposition limits
- 14:5514:55, 30 March 2026 diff hist +74 Local heterogeneity limits in SPM microscopy →Codeposition limits: cleanup
- 14:5314:53, 30 March 2026 diff hist +790 Local heterogeneity limits in SPM microscopy new section == Codeposition limits == and some cleanup
- 14:4314:43, 30 March 2026 diff hist +1,853 N Local heterogeneity limits in SPM microscopy basic page
- 13:3613:36, 30 March 2026 diff hist +22 m Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief →Preserving of tip apex structure during transfer to a different macroscale sample (and back): addeed link to yet unwritten page local heterogeneity limits in SPM microscopy current
- 13:3313:33, 30 March 2026 diff hist +2 Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief →Experimental demonstrations: moved the adapter molecule paper
- 13:3013:30, 30 March 2026 diff hist +1,028 Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief →Experimental demonstrations: added section == Scanning with stiffer probes tip apex structures at higher temperatures ==
- 13:1613:16, 30 March 2026 diff hist +251 Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief →Progress in atomically resolving nc-AFM on AP nanographenes & less flat structures: improvements
- 13:1313:13, 30 March 2026 diff hist +393 Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief →Progress in atomically resolving nc-AFM on AP nanographenes & less flat structures: improvements
- 13:0513:05, 30 March 2026 diff hist +79 Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief →SPM manipulations being automateable and scaleable: added limitations info
- 13:0313:03, 30 March 2026 diff hist +137 Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief →Strong covalent nano-molecular manipulation in 3D: added headline: == Purely mechanical controlled abstraction of a single hydrogen atom using a dedicated strongly covalent chemisorbed adapter molecule ==
- 13:0113:01, 30 March 2026 diff hist +19 m Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief →Scanning in 3D (high vertical ledges) is now possible
- 13:0013:00, 30 March 2026 diff hist −195 Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief headline hierarchy 1 level up & removed info redundant with chapternames
- 12:5612:56, 30 March 2026 diff hist +312 Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief added section == Meta info ==
- 12:5012:50, 30 March 2026 diff hist +69 Why gemstone metamaterial technology should work in brief →Related: link to factored out page: Why force applying mechanosynthesis should work in brief current