Microcomponent subsystems: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "A good '''design goal''' is to aim to '''make systems of diamondoid - microcomponents mergable''' such that many kinds of diamondoid metamaterials can freely be in..." |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
such that many kinds of [[diamondoid metamaterials]] can freely be interspersed | such that many kinds of [[diamondoid metamaterials]] can freely be interspersed | ||
and more complex ''microcomponent subsystems'' can be interwoven. | and more complex ''microcomponent subsystems'' can be interwoven. | ||
Microcomponent subsystems can be: | |||
* homogenous [[diamondoid metamaterials]] | |||
* heterogenous | |||
Examples for heterogenous subsystems are: | |||
* [[nanomechanical computing]] systems | |||
* component router systems of advanced nanotactiries | |||
* other logistic systems with tree topology | |||
Revision as of 22:43, 13 January 2014
A good design goal is to aim to make systems of diamondoid - microcomponents mergable such that many kinds of diamondoid metamaterials can freely be interspersed and more complex microcomponent subsystems can be interwoven.
Microcomponent subsystems can be:
- homogenous diamondoid metamaterials
- heterogenous
Examples for heterogenous subsystems are:
- nanomechanical computing systems
- component router systems of advanced nanotactiries
- other logistic systems with tree topology