Folded-foldamer pushing approach: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
basic page
 
basic page
Line 1: Line 1:
{{stub}}
{{stub}}


This approach competes against [[self-assembly]] as a symptom of the [[Positional assembly redundancy blockade]].
This page is about the possible approach of <br>
pushing (or pulling if possible) small already self-assembled structures around on a surface  <br>
in order to assemble them via [[SPM]] ([[Top down positional assembly]]) to bigger structures. <br>
Small means: All the input parts have undergone just the first level of [[hierarchical self-assembly]]. <br>
Structures hight e.g. include stiff & sturdy designed [[de-novo proteins]].
 
'''This approach competes against [[self-assembly]].''' <br>
And this is a symptom of the [[Positional assembly redundancy blockade]].
 
== PROs & CONs ==
 
'''Advantages:''' <br>
Basically evading development difficulties of selfassembly. E.g.no need to develop: <br>
– large orthogonal sets of complementary surfaces or <br>
– [[iterative selfassembly]] <br>
– [[squigglesembly]], [[circumsembly]], ...


'''Difficulties for pushing folded proteins around by SPM may include:''' <br>
'''Difficulties for pushing folded proteins around by SPM may include:''' <br>
Line 8: Line 23:
– only perhaps: crushing the specimen issues
– only perhaps: crushing the specimen issues


'''Inferiorities to self-assembly when working include:''' <br>
'''Inferiorities relative to self-assembly when working include:''' <br>
– only one product (or a few with additional difficulties) rather than several orders of magnitude simultaneously <br>
– only one product (or a few with additional difficulties) rather than several orders of magnitude simultaneously <br>
– assembly of each new product takes long
– assembly of each new product takes long
'''Advantages:''' <br>
Basically evading development difficulties of selfassembly. E.g.no need to develop:
– large orthogonal sets of complementary surfaces or
– [[iterative selfassembly]]
– [[squigglesembly]], [[circumsembly]], ...


== Related ==
== Related ==
Line 23: Line 32:
* [[Incremental path]]
* [[Incremental path]]
* [[Top down positional assembly]]
* [[Top down positional assembly]]
* [[self-assembly]], [[positional assembly]]
* [[Direct path]]

Revision as of 13:13, 17 September 2022

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

This page is about the possible approach of
pushing (or pulling if possible) small already self-assembled structures around on a surface
in order to assemble them via SPM (Top down positional assembly) to bigger structures.
Small means: All the input parts have undergone just the first level of hierarchical self-assembly.
Structures hight e.g. include stiff & sturdy designed de-novo proteins.

This approach competes against self-assembly.
And this is a symptom of the Positional assembly redundancy blockade.

PROs & CONs

Advantages:
Basically evading development difficulties of selfassembly. E.g.no need to develop:
– large orthogonal sets of complementary surfaces or
iterative selfassembly
squigglesembly, circumsembly, ...

Difficulties for pushing folded proteins around by SPM may include:
– tip bluntness at the larger scale of softer proteins
– SPM control for larger vertical motions being very limited
– only perhaps: crushing the specimen issues

Inferiorities relative to self-assembly when working include:
– only one product (or a few with additional difficulties) rather than several orders of magnitude simultaneously
– assembly of each new product takes long

Related