Talk:Design levels: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Created page with " == Issues == This page is a bit af a mess as it is now It is a mix of * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_architecture * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_design * h..."
 
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
It is a mix of
It is a mix of


* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_architecture  
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_architecture - (the conceptual model that defines the views of a system)
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_design
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_design -  (process of defining the architecture)
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_engineering
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systems_engineering - (interdisciplinary field of engineering)


* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_design
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_architecture - (high level structures of a software system)
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_architecture
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_design - (the process by which an agent creates a specification of a software artifact)
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_engineering - (application of engineering to the design, development, and maintenance of software)


I think several "orthogonal" classifications need to be entangled.
I think several "orthogonal" classifications need to be entangled.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_model


[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 10:31, 22 February 2014 (CET)
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 10:31, 22 February 2014 (CET)

Revision as of 11:51, 22 February 2014

Issues

This page is a bit af a mess as it is now It is a mix of

I think several "orthogonal" classifications need to be entangled.

Apm (talk) 10:31, 22 February 2014 (CET)