Self limitation for safety: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
added links to yet unwritten pages |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* [[Mobility prevention guideline]] | * [[Mobility prevention guideline]] | ||
Against | Against [[software hacking]]: | ||
* Usage of specialised and in function limited [[diamondoid metamaterial|metamaterials]] instead of general purpouse [[utility fog]] (e.g. shelving systems). | * Usage of specialised and in function limited [[diamondoid metamaterial|metamaterials]] instead of general purpouse [[utility fog]] (e.g. shelving systems). | ||
Against direct physical hacking attacks: | Against [[direct physical hacking attacks]]: | ||
* Combination lock stones as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned [[Grey goo meme|here]]. | * Combination lock stones as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned [[Grey goo meme|here]]. | ||
* Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time. | * Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time. | ||
Revision as of 18:30, 7 February 2022
Against software hacking:
- Usage of specialised and in function limited metamaterials instead of general purpouse utility fog (e.g. shelving systems).
Against direct physical hacking attacks:
- Combination lock stones as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned here.
- Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time.
Other: