Talk:Convergent mechanical actuation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with " Actually * "Convergent mechanical actuation" may be even better of a term than * "Confluence of mechanical actuation" since it matches up with "convergent assembl..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* "[[Convergent mechanical actuation]]" may be even better of a term than | * "[[Convergent mechanical actuation]]" may be even better of a term than | ||
* "[[Confluence of mechanical actuation]]" since it matches up with "[[convergent assembly]]" – this is not related though | * "[[Confluence of mechanical actuation]]" since it matches up with "[[convergent assembly]]" – this is not related though | ||
* "[[Confluent mechanical actuation]]" would also have been an option in between | |||
Hmm ... <br> | Hmm ... <br> | ||
[[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 19:50, 18 May 2021 (CEST) | [[User:Apm|Apm]] ([[User talk:Apm|talk]]) 19:50, 18 May 2021 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 19:51, 18 May 2021
Actually
- "Convergent mechanical actuation" may be even better of a term than
- "Confluence of mechanical actuation" since it matches up with "convergent assembly" – this is not related though
- "Confluent mechanical actuation" would also have been an option in between