Gem-gum: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Disambiguation page: added elasticity emulation case to disambiguation |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* '''[[Gemstone based metamaterial]]'''. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of <br>a [[mechanical metamaterial]] with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. | * '''[[Gemstone based metamaterial]]'''. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of <br>a [[mechanical metamaterial]] with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. | ||
* '''[[The defining traits of gem-gum-tec]]'''. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to. <br> Gem-gum-tech also called "[[gem based APM|gem(stone) based APM]]" here. | * '''[[The defining traits of gem-gum-tec]]'''. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to. <br> Gem-gum-tech also called "[[gem based APM|gem(stone) based APM]]" here. | ||
* Macroscale [[elasticity emulation]] base on [[superelasticity]] of defect free [[crystolecules]] [[Nonbonded interactions|nonbondedly]] interlocking via [[form closure]] | * Macroscale '''[[elasticity emulation]]''' base on [[superelasticity]] of defect free [[crystolecules]] [[Nonbonded interactions|nonbondedly]] interlocking via [[form closure]] | ||
== ⚠️ Related warning == | == ⚠️ Related warning == | ||
Revision as of 09:50, 18 May 2026
Disambiguation page
- Gemstone based metamaterial. Gem-gum as an intentionally paradoxical concrete example of
a mechanical metamaterial with vastly different properties to the base material. With a catchy name. - The defining traits of gem-gum-tec. What gem, gum, and gem-gum refers to.
Gem-gum-tech also called "gem(stone) based APM" here. - Macroscale elasticity emulation base on superelasticity of defect free crystolecules nonbondedly interlocking via form closure
⚠️ Related warning

Be aware that:
⚠️ Diamondoid nanoscale machinery is not at all jelly like floppy
as molecular dynamics simulations may misleadingly suggest.
This is NOT what "gum" in "gem-gum" refers to. High simulations speeds are to blame.
For details see: Misleading aspects in animations of diamondoid molecular machine elements
Actually at nominal proposed speeds (few mm/s)
nanomachinery bends and deflects LESS from machine motions
than even everyday metal macroscale machinery does.
That is due to the scaling law of same relative deflections across scales.
A better intuition: hyper-spring-steel, super-magnets, and sometimes giant forces, all at snail speed
See page: A better intuition for diamondoid nanomachinery than jelly