Self limitation for safety: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
added links to other safety pages
Line 18: Line 18:
* [[Safety towards and with gem based APM]]
* [[Safety towards and with gem based APM]]
* [[Informal laws]]
* [[Informal laws]]
----
Another case of self limiting but here not for safety but for performance:
* [[Consistent design for external limiting factors]]


[[Category:Information]]
[[Category:Information]]
[[Category:General]]
[[Category:General]]

Revision as of 20:10, 23 December 2024

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.
If objects are made form specialized gemstone based metamaterials rather than utility fog then they fundamentally can't be hacked to do direct malicious surprise attacks. Just a self suggesting example here.

Against software hacking:

  • Usage of specialised and in function limited metamaterials instead of general purpouse utility fog (e.g. shelving systems).

Against direct physical hacking attacks:

  • Combination lock stones as a safety measure against malicious disassebly attacks are metioned here.
  • Integrated oszillators as physical timer to artificially slow down the disassembly of microcomponents - this allows for more response time.

Other:

Related


Another case of self limiting but here not for safety but for performance: