Programmatic 3D modeling: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
basic page
 
Line 29: Line 29:
* http://implicitcad.org/
* http://implicitcad.org/
* https://github.com/Haskell-Things/ImplicitCAD
* https://github.com/Haskell-Things/ImplicitCAD
----
* https://libfive.com/

Revision as of 14:56, 6 June 2023

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

Pure languages - more or less usable for programmatic CAD

  • OpenSCAD (easy to learn) in both function and geometry realm which are kept separate (which is sometimes annoying)

  • haskell (hard to learn) there are 3D modeling libraries like ImplicitCAD lack of a live preview is a big issue though
  • elm (easy to learn) not aimed at 3D modelling – can do 3D stuff but not for expot for manufacturing
  • unison (mid level to learn) not aimed at 3D modelling – no 3D libraries yet :( still early

Languages requiring manual discipline (which always fails because it can)

Related

External links