Isotropy of materials: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
m just minor changes, change to less preoccupied statements |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
[[Gemstone like compound]]s have at best cubic symmetry better almost spherical isotropy (direction independence of mechanical and other properties) needs to be emulated by [[gemstone based metamaterial]]s. <br> | [[Gemstone like compound]]s have at "best" cubic symmetry better almost spherical isotropy <br> | ||
Many [[gemstone like compound]]s like e.g. trigonal α-[[silicon nitride|silicon-nitride]] (nierite) have low symmetry. This | (direction independence of mechanical and other properties) needs to be emulated by [[gemstone based metamaterial]]s. <br> | ||
Many [[gemstone like compound]]s like e.g. trigonal α-[[silicon nitride|silicon-nitride]] (nierite) have low symmetry. <br> | |||
This may make designing with them harder. Automation of design can help. | |||
Latest revision as of 12:39, 21 September 2025
Gemstone like compounds have at "best" cubic symmetry better almost spherical isotropy
(direction independence of mechanical and other properties) needs to be emulated by gemstone based metamaterials.
Many gemstone like compounds like e.g. trigonal α-silicon-nitride (nierite) have low symmetry.
This may make designing with them harder. Automation of design can help.