Ligand field theory: Difference between revisions
m →Related |
→How it works: more cleanup |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Smaller orbital => electrons closer together => higher electron pairing energy => high spin more likely | Smaller orbital => electrons closer together => higher electron pairing energy => high spin more likely | ||
The | The eight electron d-orbital-block (block … same energy electron states) <br> | ||
due to interaction in the crystal gets split up into two blocks | due to interaction in the crystal gets split up into two blocks | ||
* the t<sub>2g</sub> | * the t<sub>2g</sub> six electron block (d<sub>xy</sub>, d<sub>yz</sub>, d<sub>zy</sub>) | ||
* the e<sub>g</sub> | * the e<sub>g</sub> two electron block (d<sub>x²-y²</sub>, d<sub>z²</sub>) | ||
energy of an electron in t<sub>2g</sub> <br> | Octahedral coordination: | ||
energy of an electron in e<sub>g</sub> > energy of an electron in t<sub>2g</sub> <br> | |||
Tetrahedral coodination: '''crystal field splitting energy''': vice versa. | |||
Octahedral splitting energy … energy of e<sub>g</sub> electron minus energy of t<sub>2g</sub> electron<br> | |||
LCOAO-energies … linear combination of atomic orbitals <br> | LCOAO-energies … linear combination of atomic orbitals <br> | ||
ESR … electron spin resonance <br> | ESR … electron spin resonance <br> | ||
| Line 41: | Line 44: | ||
'''Weak field ligand and/or smaller metal orbital''' <br> | '''Weak field ligand and/or smaller metal orbital''' <br> | ||
Octahedral splitting energy < total electron pairing energy <br> | Octahedral splitting energy < total electron pairing energy <br> | ||
* e<sub>g</sub> block starts filling before any electrons occupy t<sub>2g</sub> is fully occupied | |||
* electrons in t<sub>2g</sub> block don't get paired up before moving up to the higher energy e<sub>g</sub> block (i.e. Hund's rule for all d orbitals)<br> | |||
'''=> high spin complex''' <br> | '''=> high spin complex''' <br> | ||
oversimplified: red side | oversimplified: red side absorption blue side looking material <br> | ||
more complex but higher signal ESR spectra (spin-spin coupling between multiple unpaired electrons). | more complex but higher signal ESR spectra (spin-spin coupling between multiple unpaired electrons). | ||
| Line 52: | Line 55: | ||
– all electrons in t<sub>2g</sub> do get paired up before moving up to the higher energy e<sub>g</sub> block <br> | – all electrons in t<sub>2g</sub> do get paired up before moving up to the higher energy e<sub>g</sub> block <br> | ||
'''=> low spin complex''' | '''=> low spin complex''' | ||
oversimplified: blue side | oversimplified: blue side absorption red side looking material <br> | ||
cleaner but lower signal ESR spectra | cleaner but lower signal ESR spectra | ||
'''Influenced properties:''' | |||
* electron configuration and thus | |||
* magnetic behavior: diamagnetic (all electrons paired) / paramagnetic (& how many unpaired) | |||
* frequency (sometimes color) of absorbed light | |||
'''Influencing factors:''' | '''Influencing factors:''' | ||
* strength of ligand due to chemical identity <br>(O,S,halogen, … weaker; C,N,P, … stronger) | |||
* oxidation state | * oxidation state | ||
* coordination number | * coordination number and coordination geometry <br>tetrahedral => ligands between orbitals => weak field => high spin tendentially <br>square planar coordination: d<sub>x²-y²</sub> > d<sub>z²</sub> > d<sub>xy</sub> > (d<sub>yz</sub> & d<sub>zx</sub>) | ||
== spectrochemical series == | == spectrochemical series == | ||
| Line 157: | Line 163: | ||
{{wikitodo|there are some quite good video series on ligand field theory on youtube - add links to those}} | {{wikitodo|there are some quite good video series on ligand field theory on youtube - add links to those}} | ||
Video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lT21wKoXyQ Professor Dave Explains – Crystal Field Theory] | |||
Latest revision as of 15:27, 29 June 2025
d-orbitals and f-orbitals as they fall out of the math of the Schrödinger equation
are not in match with the real situation.
Other methods like
- crystal field theory and
- ligand field theory
are used instead.
Usefulness
Tuning colors for gem-gum display technology by choice of
- d-block transition element
- ligands (forced in place via piezomechanosynthesis)
- coordination of those ligands (and background framework, see: Organometallic gemstone-like compounds)
- levels of applied stress/strain (going beyond just electrooptical conversion; possible even active actuation)
And both passive and active colors.
- For the passive side related is: Color emulation
- For the active side related is: mechanooptical conversion
Furthermore:
- Tuning for strong ferromagnetism?
- Accelerating inter system crossing for energy efficient piezomechanosynthesis?
- Having some fun with spins.
How it works
Electron pairing energy ... from electrostatic repulsion due to double-up in an orbital
Smaller orbital => electrons closer together => higher electron pairing energy => high spin more likely
The eight electron d-orbital-block (block … same energy electron states)
due to interaction in the crystal gets split up into two blocks
- the t2g six electron block (dxy, dyz, dzy)
- the eg two electron block (dx²-y², dz²)
Octahedral coordination:
energy of an electron in eg > energy of an electron in t2g
Tetrahedral coodination: crystal field splitting energy: vice versa.
Octahedral splitting energy … energy of eg electron minus energy of t2g electron
LCOAO-energies … linear combination of atomic orbitals
ESR … electron spin resonance
Weak field ligand and/or smaller metal orbital
Octahedral splitting energy < total electron pairing energy
- eg block starts filling before any electrons occupy t2g is fully occupied
- electrons in t2g block don't get paired up before moving up to the higher energy eg block (i.e. Hund's rule for all d orbitals)
=> high spin complex
oversimplified: red side absorption blue side looking material
more complex but higher signal ESR spectra (spin-spin coupling between multiple unpaired electrons).
Strong field ligand and/or bigger metal orbital
Octahedral splitting energy > total electron pairing energy
– t2g block (lower energy) gets completely filled first before any electrons occupy eg
– all electrons in t2g do get paired up before moving up to the higher energy eg block
=> low spin complex
oversimplified: blue side absorption red side looking material
cleaner but lower signal ESR spectra
Influenced properties:
- electron configuration and thus
- magnetic behavior: diamagnetic (all electrons paired) / paramagnetic (& how many unpaired)
- frequency (sometimes color) of absorbed light
Influencing factors:
- strength of ligand due to chemical identity
(O,S,halogen, … weaker; C,N,P, … stronger) - oxidation state
- coordination number and coordination geometry
tetrahedral => ligands between orbitals => weak field => high spin tendentially
square planar coordination: dx²-y² > dz² > dxy > (dyz & dzx)
spectrochemical series
- For the ligands
- For the metals?
(wiki-TODO: check if there are tables for spectrochemical series that go beyond just randomly deeming lists)
Details
Metal orbitals:
– Get reducible representation.
– Decompose reducible representation into irreducible representations
(the ones listed in character table for the relevant pointgroup)
– Construct molecular orbital type diagram for the metal complex of given geometry
Lewis basic ligands (lone pairs facing the metal):
– Use projection operator, decompose representation
– factor separate lewis pairs of electrons into symmetries
if there are metal orbitals and ligand orbitals that have the same symmetry => interaction spossible
Linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCOAO):
– Mix in phase and out of phase (bonding and antibonding respectively).
How far to shift? The strength of an interaction is inversly proportionsal to
the seperation in energy between the fragments.
=> Farther apart less shift. Noninteracting remnants blocks stay unshifted (nonbonding orbitals)
– Fill up all the low energy bonding orbitals with the ligand electrons.
(The block in the middle energies is dominated by metal d character.)
– Fill up these mid level energy orbitals.
For d0 ions nothing changes. For d10 all is filled up.
Side-note: filling up non-bonding orbitals does not break the bonds (but influences reactivity).
Interesting it gets for the middle fillup levels d4 to d7 for octahedral coordination.
Side-note:
- Two electrons in HOMO of ligand (lewis base)
- Two holes in LUMO of the metal (lewis acid)
Because its a lewis-acid lewis-base interaction (kinda like an electron deficiency bond)
In the bonding state most of the electron density contribution comes from the ligand little from the metal
- Bonding: big contribution from ligands small contribution from metal
- Antionding: big contribution from the metal small contribution from ligands
Geometries
- octahedral: common
- tetrahedral: less direct ligand approach => less level splitting => tends to be high spin
- planar square: …
- assign symmetry to an orbital … lower case
- assign symmetry to an electronic state … upper case
Frontier atomic orbitals for octahedral coordination:
- _ _ _ _ _ 3d _ 4s _ _ _ 4p … Sc-Zn
- _ _ _ _ _ 4d _ 5s _ _ _ 5p … Y-Cd
- _ _ _ _ _ 5d _ 6s _ _ _ 6p … La-Hg
- _ _ _ _ _ nd _ (n+1)s _ _ _ (n+1)p … generally
lanthanides & actinides: bonding is dominated by electrostatic interactions
f orbitals generally don't spit, don't participate in bonding, stay at about the same energy
Comparison to crystal field theory
Crystal field theory only treats electrostatic point charges and does not take into account covalency of bonds.
Ligand field theory: Combine Crystal field theory with molecular orbital theory
Crystal field theory alone: – relative shifts: center of energy analogous to center of mass – electron pairing energy not taken under consideration?
Related
- Optical effects – see "photonic steampunk" section
- Color emulation – Passive color gemstone display – Active color gemstone display
See: Organometallic gemstone-like compound – Tuning gemstone color:
- either ultra precisely with Kaehler brackets
- or with fast programmable active pressure adjusting actuation
External links
Wikibook:
Wikipedia:
(wiki-TODO: there are some quite good video series on ligand field theory on youtube - add links to those)