Exothermy offloading: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* '''[[Lagrangian mechanics for nanomechanical circuits]]''' | * '''[[Lagrangian mechanics for nanomechanical circuits]]''' | ||
* [[Dissipation sharing]] | * '''[[Dissipation sharing]]''' | ||
* [[Arrow of time]] | |||
---- | ---- | ||
* [[Drive subsystem of a gem-gum factory]] | * [[Drive subsystem of a gem-gum factory]] | ||
* [[Piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] | * [[Piezochemical mechanosynthesis]] | ||
* [[Chemomechanical converter]] | * [[Chemomechanical converter]] | ||
[[Category:Far term target]] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:39, 29 March 2026
Similar to dissipation sharing.
But instead of only equilibrating between the piezochemical mechanosynthesis sites on molecular mills
the idea here is to get the somewhere unconditionally necessary dissipation (increase in number of microstates)
all the way out to the drive system rather than within the zone of mechanosynthesis cores where piezochemical mechanosynthesis happens.
When only happening inside the mechanosynthesis cores of a gem-gum factory
then it would necessarily need to be an exothermic dissipation process since
the machine phase does not allow for an increase in positional disorder which is a prerequisite for endothermy.