Ligand field theory: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
External links: added wikitodo
How it works: more cleanup
 
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 12: Line 12:
Tuning colors for [[gem-gum display technology]] by choice of  
Tuning colors for [[gem-gum display technology]] by choice of  
* d-block transition element
* d-block transition element
* (forced) ligands
* ligands (forced in place via [[piezomechanosynthesis]])  
* coordination of those ligands (and background framework, see: [[Organometallic gemstone-like compound]]s)
* coordination of those ligands (and background framework, see: [[Organometallic gemstone-like compound]]s)
* levels of applied stress/strain (going beyond just [[electrooptical conversion]])
* levels of applied stress/strain (going beyond just [[electrooptical conversion]]; possible even active actuation)
And both passive and active colors. <br>
And both passive and active colors. <br>
* For the passive side related is: [[Color emulation]]
* For the passive side related is: [[Color emulation]]
Line 28: Line 28:
'''Electron pairing energy''' ... from electrostatic repulsion due to double-up in an orbital <br>
'''Electron pairing energy''' ... from electrostatic repulsion due to double-up in an orbital <br>
Smaller orbital => electrons closer together => higher electron pairing energy => high spin more likely  
Smaller orbital => electrons closer together => higher electron pairing energy => high spin more likely  
The eight electron d-orbital-block (block … same energy electron states) <br>
due to interaction in the crystal gets split up into two blocks
* the t<sub>2g</sub> six electron block (d<sub>xy</sub>, d<sub>yz</sub>, d<sub>zy</sub>)
* the e<sub>g</sub> two electron block (d<sub>x²-y²</sub>, d<sub>z²</sub>)
Octahedral coordination:
energy of an electron in e<sub>g</sub> > energy of an electron in t<sub>2g</sub> <br>
Tetrahedral coodination: '''crystal field splitting energy''': vice versa.
Octahedral splitting energy … energy of e<sub>g</sub> electron  minus energy of t<sub>2g</sub> electron<br>
LCOAO-energies … linear combination of atomic orbitals <br>
ESR … electron spin resonance <br>


'''Weak field ligand and/or smaller metal orbital''' <br>
'''Weak field ligand and/or smaller metal orbital''' <br>
Octahedral splitting energy < total electron pairing energy <br>  
Octahedral splitting energy < total electron pairing energy <br>  
– blocks fill up as one would expect from the LCOAO-energy contribution alone <br>  
* e<sub>g</sub> block starts filling before any electrons occupy t<sub>2g</sub> is fully occupied
electrons do get paired up <br>  
* electrons in t<sub>2g</sub> block don't get paired up before moving up to the higher energy e<sub>g</sub> block (i.e. Hund's rule for all d orbitals)<br>  
'''=> high spin complex'''
'''=> high spin complex''' <br>
oversimplified: red side absorption blue side looking material <br>
more complex but higher signal ESR spectra (spin-spin coupling between multiple unpaired electrons).


'''Strong field ligand and/or bigger metal orbital''' <br>
'''Strong field ligand and/or bigger metal orbital''' <br>
Octahedral splitting energy > total electron pairing energy <br>  
Octahedral splitting energy > total electron pairing energy <br>  
– block higher in LCOAO-energy contribution gets filled up preliminarily  <br>  
t<sub>2g</sub> block (lower energy) gets completely filled first before any electrons occupy e<sub>g</sub><br>
– electrons don't get paired up <br>  
all electrons in t<sub>2g</sub> do get paired up before moving up to the higher energy e<sub>g</sub> block <br>  
'''=> high spin complex'''
'''=> low spin complex'''
oversimplified: blue side absorption red side looking material <br>
cleaner but lower signal ESR spectra


Influencing factors:
'''Influenced properties:'''
* electron configuration and thus
* magnetic behavior: diamagnetic (all electrons paired) / paramagnetic (& how many unpaired)
* frequency (sometimes color) of absorbed light
 
'''Influencing factors:'''
* strength of ligand due to chemical identity <br>(O,S,halogen, … weaker; C,N,P, … stronger)
* oxidation state
* oxidation state
* coordination number
* coordination number and coordination geometry <br>tetrahedral => ligands between orbitals => weak field => high spin tendentially <br>square planar coordination: d<sub>x²-y²</sub> > d<sub>z²</sub> > d<sub>xy</sub> > (d<sub>yz</sub> & d<sub>zx</sub>)
* electron configuration
* coordination geometry


== spectrochemical series ==
== spectrochemical series ==
Line 117: Line 138:
== Related ==
== Related ==


* '''[[Color center]]s'''
* [[Atomic orbitals]]
* [[Atomic orbitals]]
* [[Fun with spins]]
* '''[[Fun with spins]]'''
* [[Electronic transitions]] – [[Inter system crossing]]
* [[Electronic transitions]] – [[Inter system crossing]]
----
----
Line 141: Line 163:


{{wikitodo|there are some quite good video series on ligand field theory on youtube - add links to those}}
{{wikitodo|there are some quite good video series on ligand field theory on youtube - add links to those}}
Video: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lT21wKoXyQ Professor Dave Explains – Crystal Field Theory]

Latest revision as of 15:27, 29 June 2025

This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

d-orbitals and f-orbitals as they fall out of the math of the Schrödinger equation
are not in match with the real situation.
Other methods like

  • crystal field theory and
  • ligand field theory

are used instead.

Usefulness

Tuning colors for gem-gum display technology by choice of

And both passive and active colors.

Furthermore:

How it works

Electron pairing energy ... from electrostatic repulsion due to double-up in an orbital
Smaller orbital => electrons closer together => higher electron pairing energy => high spin more likely

The eight electron d-orbital-block (block … same energy electron states)
due to interaction in the crystal gets split up into two blocks

  • the t2g six electron block (dxy, dyz, dzy)
  • the eg two electron block (dx²-y², d)

Octahedral coordination: energy of an electron in eg > energy of an electron in t2g
Tetrahedral coodination: crystal field splitting energy: vice versa.

Octahedral splitting energy … energy of eg electron minus energy of t2g electron
LCOAO-energies … linear combination of atomic orbitals
ESR … electron spin resonance

Weak field ligand and/or smaller metal orbital
Octahedral splitting energy < total electron pairing energy

  • eg block starts filling before any electrons occupy t2g is fully occupied
  • electrons in t2g block don't get paired up before moving up to the higher energy eg block (i.e. Hund's rule for all d orbitals)

=> high spin complex
oversimplified: red side absorption blue side looking material
more complex but higher signal ESR spectra (spin-spin coupling between multiple unpaired electrons).

Strong field ligand and/or bigger metal orbital
Octahedral splitting energy > total electron pairing energy
– t2g block (lower energy) gets completely filled first before any electrons occupy eg
– all electrons in t2g do get paired up before moving up to the higher energy eg block
=> low spin complex oversimplified: blue side absorption red side looking material
cleaner but lower signal ESR spectra

Influenced properties:

  • electron configuration and thus
  • magnetic behavior: diamagnetic (all electrons paired) / paramagnetic (& how many unpaired)
  • frequency (sometimes color) of absorbed light

Influencing factors:

  • strength of ligand due to chemical identity
    (O,S,halogen, … weaker; C,N,P, … stronger)
  • oxidation state
  • coordination number and coordination geometry
    tetrahedral => ligands between orbitals => weak field => high spin tendentially
    square planar coordination: dx²-y² > d > dxy > (dyz & dzx)

spectrochemical series

  • For the ligands
  • For the metals?

(wiki-TODO: check if there are tables for spectrochemical series that go beyond just randomly deeming lists)

Details

Metal orbitals: – Get reducible representation.
– Decompose reducible representation into irreducible representations
(the ones listed in character table for the relevant pointgroup)
– Construct molecular orbital type diagram for the metal complex of given geometry

Lewis basic ligands (lone pairs facing the metal): – Use projection operator, decompose representation
– factor separate lewis pairs of electrons into symmetries
if there are metal orbitals and ligand orbitals that have the same symmetry => interaction spossible

Linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCOAO): – Mix in phase and out of phase (bonding and antibonding respectively).
How far to shift? The strength of an interaction is inversly proportionsal to
the seperation in energy between the fragments.
=> Farther apart less shift. Noninteracting remnants blocks stay unshifted (nonbonding orbitals)

– Fill up all the low energy bonding orbitals with the ligand electrons.
(The block in the middle energies is dominated by metal d character.)
– Fill up these mid level energy orbitals.
For d0 ions nothing changes. For d10 all is filled up.
Side-note: filling up non-bonding orbitals does not break the bonds (but influences reactivity).
Interesting it gets for the middle fillup levels d4 to d7 for octahedral coordination.


Side-note:

  • Two electrons in HOMO of ligand (lewis base)
  • Two holes in LUMO of the metal (lewis acid)

Because its a lewis-acid lewis-base interaction (kinda like an electron deficiency bond)
In the bonding state most of the electron density contribution comes from the ligand little from the metal

  • Bonding: big contribution from ligands small contribution from metal
  • Antionding: big contribution from the metal small contribution from ligands

Geometries

  • octahedral: common
  • tetrahedral: less direct ligand approach => less level splitting => tends to be high spin
  • planar square: …
  • assign symmetry to an orbital … lower case
  • assign symmetry to an electronic state … upper case

Frontier atomic orbitals for octahedral coordination:

  • _ _ _ _ _ 3d _ 4s _ _ _ 4p … Sc-Zn
  • _ _ _ _ _ 4d _ 5s _ _ _ 5p … Y-Cd
  • _ _ _ _ _ 5d _ 6s _ _ _ 6p … La-Hg
  • _ _ _ _ _ nd _ (n+1)s _ _ _ (n+1)p … generally

lanthanides & actinides: bonding is dominated by electrostatic interactions
f orbitals generally don't spit, don't participate in bonding, stay at about the same energy

Comparison to crystal field theory

Crystal field theory only treats electrostatic point charges and does not take into account covalency of bonds.
Ligand field theory: Combine Crystal field theory with molecular orbital theory

Crystal field theory alone: – relative shifts: center of energy analogous to center of mass – electron pairing energy not taken under consideration?

Related



See: Organometallic gemstone-like compound – Tuning gemstone color:

  • either ultra precisely with Kaehler brackets
  • or with fast programmable active pressure adjusting actuation

External links

Wikibook:

Wikipedia:


(wiki-TODO: there are some quite good video series on ligand field theory on youtube - add links to those)

Video: Professor Dave Explains – Crystal Field Theory