Zero friction freestanding attachment chain transport: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
start of a page - still needs work
 
finished to basic page state
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Stub}}
Free-floating attachment chains have no direct contact to surrounding surfaces and <br>
Free-floating attachment chains have no direct contact to surrounding surfaces and <br>
[[Van der Waals force]] drops very very rapidly off with distance. <br>
[[Van der Waals force]] drops off very very rapidly off with distance. <br>
Strong dipoles and actual charges can be much longer range but those can be avoided. <br>
Strong dipoles and actual charges can be much longer range but those can be avoided. <br>


Thus transport can be pretty much friction free as long as there is no <br>
Thus due to almost completely absent interactions with the surrounding environment <br>
interaction needed like in [[molecular mill]]s.
transport via free standing attachment chains can be pretty much completely friction free. <br>
Well, as long as there is no interaction needed like in [[molecular mill]]s. <br>
 
Sprockets at the end of the transport chains and associated friction losses of course cannot be avoided.
 
== Where this may be employable ==


TODO formulate these:
In [[transport channels]] crossing [[sub-layers]] and in [[routing laysers]]. <br>
* spanning length, dynamic stability, jostles, losses at the pinions at the end,
See: [[Optimal sublayernumber for minimal friction]]
* where employable, speeds, ...
 
== Spanning length ==
 
A question is: How long a transport chain can be made freestanding. <br>
Since it's nanoscale sagging from gravity is not an issue. <br>
As are pretty much all but the most extreme jerks from external shocks. <br>
Dynamic stability: Excitation of resonant waves in the chain may be of concern. <br>
Especially with transport typically running at faster speeds than assembly. <br>


== Related ==
== Related ==
Line 19: Line 29:


Not applicable to [[Bottom scale assembly lines in gem-gum factories]] where <br>
Not applicable to [[Bottom scale assembly lines in gem-gum factories]] where <br>
lots of demsly packed physical interaction is required like in [[molecular mill]]s.
lots of densely packed physical interaction is required like in [[molecular mill]]s.
 
----
 
* [[Levitation]]

Latest revision as of 22:02, 12 March 2023

Free-floating attachment chains have no direct contact to surrounding surfaces and
Van der Waals force drops off very very rapidly off with distance.
Strong dipoles and actual charges can be much longer range but those can be avoided.

Thus due to almost completely absent interactions with the surrounding environment
transport via free standing attachment chains can be pretty much completely friction free.
Well, as long as there is no interaction needed like in molecular mills.

Sprockets at the end of the transport chains and associated friction losses of course cannot be avoided.

Where this may be employable

In transport channels crossing sub-layers and in routing laysers.
See: Optimal sublayernumber for minimal friction

Spanning length

A question is: How long a transport chain can be made freestanding.
Since it's nanoscale sagging from gravity is not an issue.
As are pretty much all but the most extreme jerks from external shocks.
Dynamic stability: Excitation of resonant waves in the chain may be of concern.
Especially with transport typically running at faster speeds than assembly.

Related

Not applicable to Bottom scale assembly lines in gem-gum factories where
lots of densely packed physical interaction is required like in molecular mills.