Bottom-up Top-down overlap: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "{{stub}} The idea here: Getting * the largest size of bottom up assemblable structures sufficiently above * the smallest size of top down manufacturable structures such t..." |
added related section |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
The idea here | The idea here is getting | ||
* the largest size of bottom-up assemblable structures sufficiently above | |||
* the smallest size of top-down manufacturable structures such | |||
* the largest size of bottom up assemblable structures sufficiently above | |||
* the smallest size of top down manufacturable structures such | |||
that the two can be made to interact in a controllable fashion. | that the two can be made to interact in a controllable fashion. | ||
| Line 18: | Line 16: | ||
(possible with another bottom-up self-assembled structure attached) <br> | (possible with another bottom-up self-assembled structure attached) <br> | ||
does not really involve a top down tech part. | does not really involve a top down tech part. | ||
== Related == | |||
* [[Top-down manufacturing]] | |||
* [[Bottom-up manufacturing]] | |||
* [[Bridging the gaps]] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:53, 12 March 2021
The idea here is getting
- the largest size of bottom-up assemblable structures sufficiently above
- the smallest size of top-down manufacturable structures such
that the two can be made to interact in a controllable fashion.
Examples
- Aligning self-assembled structures in/on photolithographically created structures
- Grabbing bottom-up self-assembled structures by MEMS tweezers
- What about Exponential assembly that involves both top-down manufactured and self-assembled bottom up manufactured structures?
- ...
Side-note: Manipulating self assembled structures with an SPM tip
(possible with another bottom-up self-assembled structure attached)
does not really involve a top down tech part.