Same frequencies for smaller machinery

With frequencies kept constant for smaller machinery, speeds fall linearly for smaller machinery.
This is leading to a bad unter-utilization of nanoscale machinery capabilities.

Random example taking taking FFF 3D printing as a macroscale baseline for frequency.

• 100mm/s like average 3D printer speeds at 10cm=100mm scale (1Hz)
• => 1mm/s at 1mm scale => 1um/s at 1um scale
• => 10nm/s at 10nm scale

That is even slower than diffusion based transport in bilogical nanosystems.
Proposed speeds for advanced diamondoid/gemstone-based nanosystems. In the book Nanosystems proposed where around 4mm/s at the smallest scales (~10nm).
And natural would be to (non-gradually) move back up to at least 100mm/s when moving back up to the the macroscale (10cm=100mm).

Same absolute speeds for smaller machinery seems to be a better baseline but also a bad one.
Still giving a design space point far away from even the beginning of any halfway decent optimization.

Related pages

• Complement page to: Same absolute speeds for smaller machinery
• Convergent assembly

---

Resonance frequencies for smaller mechanical resonators going up.
Insect wing frequencies going up for smaller insects. And such.
See: Scale natural frequency