MecCirc project: Difference between revisions

From apm
Jump to navigation Jump to search
added section ==Wires==
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 53: Line 53:
(not choosing operation speed to be scale invariant) <br>
(not choosing operation speed to be scale invariant) <br>
but instead is a deliberate slowdown. <br>
but instead is a deliberate slowdown. <br>
Still much faster than macroscale. <br>
See: [[Higher throughput of smaller machinery]]


== Related ==
== Related ==
Line 70: Line 73:
* '''[[Drive subsystem of a gem-gum factory]]'''
* '''[[Drive subsystem of a gem-gum factory]]'''
* [[Lagrangian mechanics for nanomechanical circuits]]
* [[Lagrangian mechanics for nanomechanical circuits]]
----
* [[Energy recuperation]]


=== Related mechanisms ===
=== Related mechanisms ===
Line 75: Line 80:
* [[whippletree]]s & [[ZigZag differential]]s … linear analog to mechanical differential and analog to trivial simple electrical forks
* [[whippletree]]s & [[ZigZag differential]]s … linear analog to mechanical differential and analog to trivial simple electrical forks
* [[Linear reciprocative pseudogears]] … wire analogy redirection; partial electrical transformer analogy
* [[Linear reciprocative pseudogears]] … wire analogy redirection; partial electrical transformer analogy
* [[Mechanical springs as energy buffers]] ([[Chemospring]])

Latest revision as of 14:49, 12 July 2026

This article defines a novel term (that is hopefully sensibly chosen). The term is introduced to make a concept more concrete and understand its interrelationship with other topics related to atomically precise manufacturing. For details go to the page: Neologism.
This article is a stub. It needs to be expanded.

Up: ReMec projects

The idea here is to do some scale transposed prototyping of
the mechanical analogs to analog electrical elements (and basic circuits).

It seems this has lesser potential for macroscole co-use
than some of the other of the ReMec projects like e.g.
a concrete ReChain instance of the the ReChain frame systems sub-project.

Mechanical quantities of force/torque and linear/angular speed
being vectorial rather than scalar as in the electrical case
makes sets of standard elements more challenging.
★ It is a bigger design space for the mechanical analogs.
★ It is an additional less or more achievable challenge
… to factor directionality apart from core function
… as is what would be a desired separation of concerns.

Desired standard elements

See: Mechanical-electrical analogies

  • capacitors => springs (linear & coil)
  • inductors => reciprocative masses & flywheels
  • resistors => friction elements (easy for macroscale, interesting for nanoscale, see: snap-back
  • transistors => clutches
  • transformer => no clean analog
  • no clean analog => gear train & sprocket chain transmissions (these work purely linear reciprocative too)
  • trivial wire forks => complex mechanical differentials
    incuding: planetary gearboxes, linear recirocative analogs (whippletrees & ZigZag differentials)
  • electrical wires => axles and reciprocative struts, both may be in the form of chains to go around corners,
    or use special mechanism for that, like gears or linkages,
    note that purely linear gears exist too (linear reciprocative pseudogears),
    these avoid any nonlinearity but are not used at macroscale due to macroscale-specific friction and wear (probably).
  • gyrators => (TODO: what would be the analog there?)

Electic transformers

These mix inductance (reciprocative masses & flywheels) inertia
with the voltage-vs-current see saw (mechanical transmission)
mechanical transmission avoiud that

Gyrators

The idea here is to simulate inductances using capacitors.
That would be useful as masses at the nanoscale to get resonance frequencies down
are huge in volume and atom count. Even when using dense metallic lead or similar.
(wiki-TODO: Find out if that is possible for power too or only for logic.)

Wires

Electrical wires have barely any relevant inductance unless going up to really high frequencies.
Mechanical axles an rods have notable inertia in comparison,
but it is much less an issue for nanoscale mechanics operating at MHz and a few mm/s.
As is is proposed for advanced productive nanosystems.
Which is not following same absolute speeds for smaller machinery
(not choosing operation speed to be scale invariant)
but instead is a deliberate slowdown.

Still much faster than macroscale.
See: Higher throughput of smaller machinery

Related






Related mechanisms